简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
SEC Charges Binance and Founder Changpeng Zhao with 13 Violations
Abstract:SEC charges Binance and founder with 13 violations: deceptive practices, securities law violations, manipulation, unregistered exchanges, misleading investors.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed charges against Binance Holdings Ltd., BAM Trading Services Inc., and their founder Changpeng Zhao, alleging various securities law violations. Binance, which operates the world's largest crypto asset trading platform, Binance.com, and its U.S.-based affiliate, BAM Trading, along with Zhao, are accused of deceptive practices and violation of securities laws.
Subversion of Controls and Secret Operations
The SEC claims that despite public claims by Zhao and Binance that U.S. customers were restricted from trading on Binance.com, they actually bypassed their own controls to allow high-value U.S. customers to continue trading secretly. Similarly, while Zhao and Binance maintained that Binance.US was an independent platform for U.S. investors, they allegedly controlled its operations behind the scenes.
Control of Customer Assets and Manipulative Trading
Furthermore, the SEC alleges that Zhao and Binance exercised control over customer assets, permitting them to commingle and divert assets as they pleased, including to Zhao's owned and controlled entity, Sigma Chain. The complaint also accuses BAM Trading and BAM Management of misleading investors about non-existent trading controls on the Binance.US platform, while Sigma Chain engaged in manipulative trading to inflate trading volume. The defendants are accused of concealing the fact that they commingled billions of dollars in investor assets and transferred them to a third-party corporation named Merit Peak Limited, which Zhao also owns.
Violations of Registration-Related Provisions
Binance and BAM Trading are charged in the SEC complaint with running unregistered national securities exchanges, broker-dealers, and clearing agencies. It also accuses them of the unregistered offer and sale of their own crypto assets, including BNB (exchange token), BUSD (stablecoin), certain crypto-lending products, and a staking-as-a-service program. Additionally, Zhao is deemed a control person for the operation of these unregistered entities.

Deception, Conflicts of Interest, and Evasion
SEC Chair Gary Gensler remarked on the case, noting, “Through thirteen charges, we allege that Zhao and Binance entities engaged in an extensive web of deception, conflicts of interest, lack of disclosure, and calculated evasion of the law.” Gensler emphasized that the defendants misled investors about risk controls, manipulated trading volumes, and concealed important operational details. He warned the public to exercise caution when investing with or on these unlawful platforms.
Conscious Evasion of Rules
Gurbir S. Grewal, Director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement, added, “We allege that Zhao and the Binance entities not only knew the rules of the road, but they also consciously chose to evade them and put their customers and investors at risk – all in an effort to maximize their own profits.” Grewal said that their many unregistered offers, as well as their refusal to register while acting as exchanges, brokers, dealers, and clearing agencies, presented substantial dangers and conflicts of interest for investors.
Unregistered Exchange, Broker, and Clearing Agency
The SEC's complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, contends that Binance.com and Binance.US, controlled by Zhao since at least July 2017, acted as exchanges, brokers, dealers, and clearing agencies, earning over $11.6 billion in revenue, including transaction fees from U.S. customers. The SEC asserts that Binance should have registered as an exchange, broker-dealer, and clearing agency for Binance.com, and Binance and BAM Trading should have registered as an exchange and clearing agency for Binance.US. BAM Trading should have also registered as a broker-dealer. Zhao is held liable as a control person for the registration violations of Binance and BAM Trading.
Unregistered Offer and Sale of Crypto Assets
The SEC has also charged Binance with the unregistered offer and sale of various crypto assets, including BNB, BUSD, and crypto-lending products known as “Simple Earn” and “BNB Vault.” BAM Trading, on the other hand, is accused of the unregistered offer and sale of Binance.US' staking-as-a-service program. The complaint highlights that Binance secretly controlled assets staked by U.S. customers in BAM's staking program.
Failure to Restrict U.S. Investors from Binance.com
According to the SEC's complaint, Zhao and Binance established BAM Management and BAM Trading in September 2019 as part of a scheme to evade U.S. federal securities laws. They claimed that BAM Trading operated independently and that U.S. customers couldn't access the Binance.com platform. However, the complaint alleges that Zhao and Binance maintained substantial involvement and control over the U.S. entity, allowing high-value U.S. customers continued access to Binance.com. In one instance, the Binance chief compliance officer referred to operating as an “unlicensed securities exchange in the USA.”

Misleading Investors
BAM Trading and BAM Management are accused of misleading Binance.US customers and equity investors regarding the existence and adequacy of market surveillance and controls to detect manipulative trading. The complaint alleges that the undisclosed market-making firm Sigma Chain, owned by Zhao, engaged in strategic and targeted wash trading, exposing the falsehood of BAM Trading's statements about market surveillance and controls.
SEC's Investigation and Litigation
The SEC's investigation into the violations related to the Binance.US platform was conducted by Kathleen Hitchins, Ann Rosenfield, and Colby Steele, with the assistance of Ainsley Kerr, John Marino, and Donald Battle, under the supervision of Paul Kim. Michael Baker, Donna K. Norman, and Martin Zerwitz led the investigation into the Binance.com platform infractions, with support from Sachin Verma and Alexander Lefferts and supervision from Deborah A. Tarasevich. Both cases were overseen by Jorge G. Tenreiro and David Hirsch of the SEC's Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit. The case is being handled by Matthew Scarlato, Jennifer Farer, and J. Emmett Murphy, with the help of Hope Hall Augustini, and is overseen by David Nasse, Olivia Choe, and Mr. Tenreiro.
The charges brought by the SEC against Binance Holdings Ltd., BAM Trading Services Inc., and Changpeng Zhao highlight the alleged extensive deception, conflicts of interest, and violation of securities laws. The case underscores the importance of transparency and adherence to regulations within the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency industry.
Stay informed with the latest news by downloading and installing the WikiFX App on your smartphone. Access the App through this link: https://social1.onelink.me/QgET/px2b7i8n.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Related broker
Read more

Seaprimecapitals Withdrawal Problems: A Complete Guide to Risks and User Experiences
Worries about Seaprimecapitals withdrawal problems and possible Seaprimecapitals withdrawal delay are important for any trader. Being able to get your money quickly and reliably is the foundation of trust between a trader and their broker. When questions come up about this basic process, it's important to look into what's causing them. This guide will tackle these concerns head-on, giving you a clear, fact-based look at Seaprimecapitals' withdrawal processes, user experiences, and trading conditions. Most importantly, we'll connect these real-world issues to the single most important factor behind them: whether the broker is properly regulated. Understanding this connection is key to figuring out the real risk to your capital and making a smart decision.

iFX Brokers Review: Do Traders Face Withdrawal Issues, Deposit Credit Failures & Free Coupon Mess?
Have you had to pay several fees at iFX Brokers? Had your trading profit been transferred to a scamming website, causing you losses? Failed to receive withdrawals from your iFX Brokers trading account? Has your deposit failed to reflect in your trading account? Got deceived in the name of a free coupon? Did the broker officials not help you in resolving your queries? Your problems resonate with many of your fellow traders at iFX Brokers. In this iFX Brokers review article, we have explained these problems and attached traders’ screenshots. Read on!

NinjaTrader Exposed: Why Traders are Calling Out NinjaTrader’s Lifetime Plan & Chart Data
Did NinjaTrader onboard you in the name of the Lifetime Plan, but its ordinary customer service left you in a poor trading state? Do you witness price chart-related discrepancies on the NinjaTrader app? Did you have to go through numerous identity and address proof checks for account approval? These problems occupy much of the NinjaTrader review online. In this article, we have discussed these through complaint screenshots. Take a look!

Questrade Review Pros, Cons and Regulation
Is Questrade legit? Yes—CIRO regulated broker offering stocks, ETFs, forex, CFDs, bonds, and more with low fees and modern platforms.
