简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
CFTC Penalizes UK Trader Cobb-Webb $150,000 for Spoofing in NYMEX WTI Futures
Abstract:CFTC imposes $150,000 penalty on UK trader Adam Cobb-Webb for illegal spoofing in NYMEX WTI Futures contracts, highlighting commitment to market integrity.

Today, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) made a significant move in ensuring the integrity of financial markets. The CFTC issued an order against UK-based trader, Adam Cobb-Webb, filing and settling charges for his involvement in several instances of spoofing in West Texas Intermediate (WTI) light sweet crude oil futures contracts. These contracts were traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (NYMEX) between approximately December 16, 2021, and January 14, 2022.
Spoofing, an illegal practice involving the placing and then canceling of orders with no intention of executing them, has been at the center of this case. According to the order, Cobb-Webb regularly employed a manipulative trading pattern that involved placing an iceberg order (an order whose total quantity is partially visible) on one side of the order book to be executed. At the same time, he would place a series of fully-visible orders (spoof orders) on the opposite side, at the initial price levels, with the sole intention of canceling them before execution.
After successfully executing the iceberg orders, Cobb-Webb would proceed to cancel the spoof orders. This pattern of trading occurred daily throughout the specified period. Notably, Cobb-Webb's spoof orders constituted a significant percentage of orders at the top price levels when placed. Furthermore, the quantity of these spoof orders was often several times larger than the visible quantity of his iceberg orders.

The order pointed out that Cobb-Webb entered the spoof orders intending to cancel them, with the goal of creating a misleading impression of buying or selling interest. This was done with the aim of inducing other market participants to cross the bid-ask spread and fill his iceberg orders. Cobb-Webb knew or recklessly disregarded the fact that these spoof orders would create a false image of market depth, thereby disseminating misleading information about supply and demand. This kind of misinformation can significantly influence market activity.
In the wake of these findings, the CFTC ordered Cobb-Webb to pay a hefty civil monetary penalty of $150,000. Additionally, the trader has been slapped with a one-year trading ban from all CFTC-designated exchanges, CFTC-registered entities, and all commodity interests. He is also required to desist from violating the spoofing prohibition outlined in the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA).
Ian McGinley, the Director of Enforcement at the CFTC, underscored the implications of this order. He noted, “This order is the latest in a long series of actions by the Commission to punish spoofing in the markets the Commission oversees. Spoofing is easier than ever for the Commission to identify and pursue. Our message to would-be spoofers is this: Dont.”
The CFTC extends its appreciation to the CME Group for its assistance in this case. It is worth noting that the staff of the Division of Enforcement who worked tirelessly on this action include Ashley J. Burden, Matthew Edelstein, Elizabeth N. Pendleton, Scott R. Williamson, and Robert T. Howell.
For those eager to stay informed on the latest market news and updates, it is recommended to download and install the WikiFX App on your smartphone. It provides real-time updates and valuable insights into the world of finance. Download the App here: https://www.wikifx.com/en/download.html.

In conclusion, this action taken by the CFTC serves as a stern warning to all market participants. The Commission remains dedicated to safeguarding the integrity of the financial markets and will not hesitate to enforce penalties on those found violating the rules. As such, all traders must adhere strictly to the rules to avoid facing similar repercussions.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Voices of the Golden Insight Award Jury | Kazuaki Takabatake, CCO of Titan FX
WikiFX Golden Insight Award uniting industry forces to build a safe and healthy forex ecosystem, driving industry innovation and sustainable development, launches a new feature series — “Voices of the Golden Insight Awards Jury.” Through in-depth conversations with distinguished judges, this series explores the evolving landscape of the forex industry and the shared mission to promote innovation, ethics, and sustainability.

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr
