简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
ASIC bans the director of Foxi Capital AU from providing financial services for eight years
Abstract:In a recent development, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has imposed a ban on Shaun Fox, the director of Foxi Capital AU Pty Ltd and an authorized representative of Responsible Entity Services Ltd. The ban prohibits him from providing financial services and engaging in any related business activities for a period of eight years.

In a recent development, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has imposed a ban on Shaun Fox, the director of Foxi Capital AU Pty Ltd and an authorized representative of Responsible Entity Services Ltd. The ban prohibits him from providing financial services and engaging in any related business activities for a period of eight years.
Shaun Fox, who established RAIC Pty Ltd (now known as Foxi Capital AU) in November 2020, offered investment opportunities to consumers, including units in the Pleasure Point Mine Unit Trust and Plazrok Investor Trust. He also presented consumers with options to invest in various property developments through the Retirement and Investment Centre and RAIC Capital.
ASIC's investigation revealed that Mr. Fox breached financial services laws by making false and misleading statements and engaging in deceptive conduct regarding financial products.
Specifically, Mr. Fox misled several investors by assuring them that they could transfer their investments from older property schemes to the Pleasure Point Mine Unit Trust under similar terms. However, these investors did not receive certificates or appear on the Unitholder Register as promised.
Furthermore, Mr. Fox claimed to have granted investors equity through shares in Pleasure Point Mine Pty Ltd. However, these investors did not appear on the Pleasure Point Mine Pty Ltd Shareholder Register and were not provided with share certificates.
Based on the findings, ASIC concluded that Mr. Fox lacked the necessary qualifications, industry experience, and competence to engage in financial services. The regulatory body also determined that he was likely to contravene financial services laws and identified instances of his misuse of Plazrok Investor Trust funds.
Mr. Fox has the option to appeal ASIC's decision by seeking a review from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Scandinavian Capital Markets Exposed: Traders Cry Foul Play Over Trade Manipulation & Fund Scams
Does Scandinavian Capital Markets stipulate heavy margin requirements to keep you out of positions? Have you been deceived by their price manipulation tactic? Have you lost all your investments as the broker did not have risk management in place? Were you persuaded to bet on too risky and scam-ridden instruments by the broker officials? These are some burning issues traders face here. In this Scandinavian Capital Markets review guide, we have discussed these issues. Read on to explore them.

Uniglobe Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Explained: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker isn't just measured in pips and spreads; it's fundamentally defined by the reliability and transparency of its financial operations. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital seamlessly is the bedrock of trust between a trader and their brokerage. When this process is fraught with delays, ambiguity, or outright failure, it undermines the entire trading relationship. This in-depth analysis focuses on Uniglobe Markets, a broker that has been operational for 5-10 years and presents itself as a world-class trading partner. We will move beyond the marketing claims to scrutinize the realities of its funding mechanisms. By examining available data on Uniglobe Markets deposits and withdrawals, we aim to provide a clear, evidence-based picture for traders evaluating this broker for long-term engagement. Our investigation will be anchored primarily in verified records and user exposure reports to explain the Uniglobe Mar

In-Depth Review of Uniglobe Markets Trading Conditions and Account Types – An Analysis for Traders
For experienced traders, selecting a broker is a meticulous process that extends far beyond headline spreads and bonus offers. It involves a deep dive into the fundamental structure of a broker's offering: its regulatory standing, the integrity of its trading conditions, and the flexibility of its account types. Uniglobe Markets, a broker with an operational history spanning over five years, presents a complex case study. It offers seemingly attractive conditions, including high leverage and a diverse account structure, yet operates within a regulatory framework that demands intense scrutiny. This in-depth analysis will dissect the Uniglobe Markets trading conditions and account types, using data primarily sourced from the global broker inquiry platform, WikiFX. We will explore the Uniglobe Markets minimum deposit, leverage, and account types to provide a clear, data-driven perspective for traders evaluating this broker as a potential long-term partner.

KEY TO MARKETS Review: Are Traders Facing Withdrawal Delays, Deposit Issues & Trade Manipulation?
Did your deposits in KEY TO MARKETS’ forex trading fail to reflect despite numerous follow-ups with the broker? Are you facing margin lock up and withdrawal issues due to stuck limit orders? Do you find losses due to wide spreads on the KEY TO MARKETS login? Similar issues have been expressed by many traders online. In this KEY TO MARKETS review article, we will take a close look at the complaints. Read on!
