In my experience as a trader, the regulatory status of Victory Securities under the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong is a crucial factor in assessing the safety of my funds. The SFC is recognized as a stringent financial authority, imposing rigorous requirements on licensed brokers regarding client fund segregation, financial reporting, and operational transparency. This means that, unlike unregulated or loosely regulated entities, Victory Securities must adhere to standards designed to minimize risks such as misuse of client monies or insolvency issues. For me, knowing that Victory Securities has been regulated for over two decades offers a layer of reassurance. Regulatory oversight subjects the broker to regular audits and requires the firm to comply with anti-money laundering laws, risk management protocols, and ongoing capital adequacy requirements. These processes make it less likely that the broker could engage in fraudulent or negligent practices without detection. However, while regulation doesn’t eliminate all risks—market losses and operational issues can still occur—it significantly reduces the likelihood of severe misconduct or systemic failure. In summary, the SFC regulation provides important structural safeguards and transparency, helping me feel more confident that my funds are handled with a baseline of professional accountability and legal protection. I believe that prioritizing brokers with credible regulatory oversight is always a prudent step in responsible trading.