WikiFX

Reply

Drawing on my experience comparing brokers’ fee structures, I pay very close attention to hidden or poorly disclosed charges, including inactivity fees, since these can impact traders’ long-term costs and overall account value. With Fulbright Financial Group, based on the available data, I have not identified any specific information indicating the presence of inactivity fees. Their fee structure is reasonably transparent regarding items like trading commissions, platform access, margin rates, and a handful of administrative or service charges (for example, monthly statement reissues or Section 329 requests). However, nothing in their published schedule outlines any penalty or maintenance charge for inactive accounts. From a risk management perspective, I remain vigilant, as the absence of explicit mention does not always guarantee that such fees are never assessed. Some brokers may introduce or amend these policies with little notice. In this case, Fulbright offers no demo account option, and there are a few areas where disclosure is limited—such as the minimum deposit—so I would consider it prudent to independently verify all terms directly with their client support before funding a real-money account. For me, clarity around fee policies (including inactivity) is a key element in assessing the trustworthiness of any financial institution. Until Fulbright provides more direct, written confirmation, I would recommend that anyone considering them ask specifically about inactivity fees and get a full fee schedule in writing to protect their interests.