WikiFX

Reply

As an independent forex trader with years of experience navigating platforms of varying credibility, transparency around fees is always a top priority for me. With EA Capital, I approached my research with extra caution due to several risk markers I encountered. Although the broker claims to operate out of South Africa under a supposed FSCA license, the regulatory listing has been flagged as a suspicious clone. This is a significant concern for me, because solid regulation is crucial when it comes to the protection of funds and disclosure of all costs, including potential hidden charges. Looking through the available public information, I was unable to find clear or detailed disclosure of deposit or withdrawal fees on EA Capital’s official channels. The website was notably sparse on this point and did not present a full fee schedule. In my experience, fully regulated and trustworthy brokers typically put these details front and center, as regulatory standards demand clear communication about all costs that could impact a client’s funds. The lack of transparency here is a red flag, because it could either mean the information is not readily available or, potentially, that such charges exist but are not being made explicit. Given the high-risk warnings and the absence of direct disclosure, I personally would not assume that all transactions are fee-free. Instead, I would advise any fellow trader to be extremely cautious, actively confirm all fee information with their customer service, and avoid funding an account unless they’ve received written confirmation of the full fee structure. For me, transparency is non-negotiable, and when it’s missing—especially with a broker flagged for regulatory concerns—I consider this a substantial risk I am not comfortable taking.