WikiFX Deep Dive Review: ExpertOption
Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:On February 28, 2025, a UK court sentenced 46-year-old Olumide Osunkoya to four years in prison for illegally operating a cryptocurrency ATM network, laundering over £2.5 million, and engaging in related offenses. This marks the first criminal conviction in the UK for unregistered crypto asset operations.

Case Overview and Judicial Statement
Between December 2021 and March 2022, Osunkoya managed a network of crypto ATMs through his company, GidiPlus Ltd, despite being denied registration by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). Operating such machines without regulatory approval is illegal in the UK. To avoid detection, he later transferred ownership of the ATMs from GidiPlus Ltd and continued operations under a different name, managing up to 12 machines personally.
During his operations, Osunkoya failed to implement essential anti-money laundering measures, allowing criminals to potentially use the ATMs for illicit financial activities. In addition to running the unauthorized crypto ATM network, he was convicted of forging bank statements, using false identity documents, and holding illicitly acquired funds.
At his sentencing, Judge Perrins emphasized the severity of his actions, stating that Osunkoya had deliberately defied regulations and gone to great lengths to conceal his identity. The judge noted that his actions were premeditated and well-orchestrated, describing the case as more than just a regulatory infraction but a calculated attempt to circumvent the law.
Osunkoyas Admission of Five Charges
GidiPlus Ltd initially sought registration under the UKs Money Laundering Regulations in 2020. However, the FCA rejected its application in December 2021, preventing the company from legally operating crypto ATMs. Despite this rejection, Osunkoya proceeded with his business, leading to multiple charges.
Osunkoya pleaded guilty to five offenses, including two counts of operating a crypto ATM network without FCA authorization—one as the director of GidiPlus Ltd and another as an independent operator. Additional charges included forging documents to pass financial checks, using fake identity documents to register a company under a false alias, and possessing £19,540 in illicitly obtained cash. Reports suggest that he profited significantly from his operations, applying transaction markups of 30% to 60%.
UKs Evolving Crypto Regulatory Landscape
The UKs approach to cryptocurrency regulation has been evolving to address the rapid growth of the digital asset market. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has been at the forefront, implementing measures to ensure consumer protection and market integrity.
In February 2023, the UK Treasury released a consultation paper outlining proposed changes to crypto regulation, aiming to integrate cryptoassets into the existing financial services framework. The governments response in October 2023 highlighted key developments, including establishing a broad definition of cryptoassets, expanding the regulatory perimeter, and enhancing financial crime requirements. These steps are designed to foster innovation while mitigating risks associated with digital assets.
Furthermore, the FCA has announced plans to implement a comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptoassets by 2026, aligning with global efforts to regulate the sector. This framework will address capital requirements, insider trading, and execution standards, bringing the crypto industry more in line with traditional financial sectors. The FCA‘s proactive approach underscores the UK’s commitment to supporting a safe and innovative crypto market, ensuring that operators adhere to stringent standards to protect consumers and maintain market integrity.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.

If you are looking into ICM Capital (also known simply as ICM), you might be attracted by their established history since 2017 or their access to the MetaTrader platforms. However, glancing at the surface isn't enough when your capital is at risk. With a concerning WikiFX Score of 2.46 out of 10, this broker is currently flashing warning signals that every potential client needs to understand before hitting the "Deposit" button.

In the world of online trading, trust is the currency that matters most. However, recent data aggregation by WikiFX has signaled a "level red" alert regarding Tradeview Markets. Between July and November 2025, our support center was flooded with complaints alleging that the broker unilaterally wiped out account balances under the guise of "negative balance reversal," while simultaneously employing "account deletion" tactics in Asian markets. This report investigates the alarming patterns behind these complaints and analyzes why existing regulations failed to protect these traders.

For traders asking, "Is ZarVista legit?", the evidence points to a clear and strong conclusion: ZarVista operates as a high-risk broker. While it shows a modern interface and different account types, these features are overshadowed by major weaknesses in how it is regulated, a history of legal problems, and many user complaints. This article will break down these issues to give you a complete view of the risks involved. Our analysis shows that the chance of losing capital when dealing with ZarVista is very high. The combination of weak overseas licensing and documented problems creates a situation where trader funds are not properly protected.