简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Former Melbourne director sentenced to six months’ imprisonment for fraud
Abstract:On April 20, 2023, ASIC announced in a statement that Steven Phillip Heaton of South Melbourne, Victoria, had been sentenced in the County Court of Victoria to six months’ imprisonment following his conviction on fraud charges.

On April 20, 2023, ASIC announces a statement that Steven Phillip Heaton of South Melbourne, Victoria, has been sentenced in County Court of Victoria to six months imprisonment following his conviction on fraud chargers.
Mr. Heaton was also ordered to complete a two-year Community Corrections Order.
Who is Heaton?
Steven Philip Heaton was a former director of Independent Product Pty Ltd CAN 169 714 032 (Deregistered) and HVPS Holdings Pty Ltd CAN 169 713 615 (In Liquidation). The companies were specifically incorporated to commercialise an air-conditioning invention that Mr Heaton claimed had significant energy efficiencies.
Crime
An ASIC investigation found that between 9 November 2015 and 20 January 2017, Mr Heaton dishonestly made false representations to a number of investors by claiming that BHP Billiton Limited (as it was known) had purchased 100 units for its mining operations when it had not. Consequently, investors collectively loaned to Independent Products, and invested with HVPS Holdings, a total of $1,092,500.33.
Mr Heaton was sentenced on 19 April 2023, with His Honour Judge Rozen remarking that Mr Heatons conduct constituted a deliberate and sophisticated fraud that enabled him to obtain over $1 million dollars over a seventeen-month period, and was a clear breach of trust.
As a result of his conviction for dishonesty offences, Mr Heaton is automatically disqualified from managing corporations for five years commencing from the date he is released from prison. His Community Correction Order will commence upon his release and requires that he perform 200 hours of unpaid community work.
The matter was prosecuted by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions after a referral from ASIC.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

ASIC Launches Preliminary Investigation into Clime Australian Income Fund
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has launched a preliminary investigation into the Clime Australian Income Fund, examining whether the Fund’s Target Market Determination (TMD) and Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) comply with Australian financial regulations. The investigation will also assess whether any breaches of the law have occurred in relation to the Fund’s investment activities.

HSBC announced a $1.1 billion charge linked to the largest Ponzi scheme in financial history
The British banking giant HSBC Holdings Plc has announced a potential $1.1 billion charge connected to the long-running Bernard Madoff Ponzi scheme, following a legal ruling in Luxembourg. The claim stems from Herald Fund, a European investment fund that sued HSBC over alleged losses related to the Madoff fraud.

BofA Securities pays more than $150K fine to settle its charge
BofA Securities, Inc. (BofAS) has agreed to pay a $155,000 fine and accept a censure from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) after FINRA found multiple violations of market trading and supervisory rules.

SC Urges Malaysians To Stay Alert As Scam Complaints Double Since 2020
Malaysia’s Securities Commission warns that complaints about unlicensed investment activities have doubled in five years—3,602 cases in 2024 and 2,039 in H1 2025—highlighting increasingly sophisticated scams targeting even professionals and seniors. Schemes often mimic legitimacy, then block withdrawals via “compliance” or “maintenance” excuses. The core defense is pre-investment verification and ongoing risk control.
