简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
The FMA Issues a Warning Regarding Fraudsters Posing as Regulators
Abstract:On Tuesday, the Financial Markets Authority (FMA), which regulates the New Zealand financial industry, issued a warning about a person posing as a regulator employee. Cold-calling customers is being used by the con artist to obtain personal information and defraud potential investors.

A scammer attempts to dupe consumers and investors by posing as a regulatory clerk.
The FMA issued four warnings about impostors in October 2022.
The Financial Markets Authority (FMA), which regulates the New Zealand financial industry, issued a warning on Tuesday about a person claiming to work for the regulator. The con artist is cold-calling customers in order to obtain personal information and defraud potential investors.
According to an FMA statement, the individual attempted to obtain personal information about the people he or she was after.
“The correspondence is made up and typical of advance fee fraud.” “Please keep in mind that, while the FMA may contact licensed or regulated entities on occasion, we will never ask for payment or financial information over the phone,” the FMA stated in a press release.
“If you receive an unsolicited call, please hang up and call us directly using the information on our website.”
The FMA reminds its representatives not to call consumers, including individual investors, cold. At the same time, it draws attention to the procedures for dealing with suspected financial fraud or scams.
In October, New Zealand's regulatory watchdog issued four warnings against impostors. Previously, three alerts were issued regarding website cloning: nzglobaltrading.com, horizon capital.ltd., and goldenchaseltd.com. These websites claimed to be registered companies in New Zealand, and they used the names of legitimate businesses such as NZ Global Trading Company Limited, Horizon Capital Limited, and Golden Chase Limited.
During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, New Zealand's FMA issued a warning about the increasing number of investment scams. During that time, the number of possible fraud attempts was significantly higher than the previous year. Furthermore, imposter scams accounted for 34% of all investment fraud.
“We're always on the lookout for scams aimed at New Zealanders, but it's like cutting the head off a hydra - two more will spring up in its place.” “You can never stop or warn about them all, and they frequently operate outside our reach, particularly overseas,” FMA Director of Regulation Liam Mason said nearly two years ago.
The FMA's experience backs up what other financial regulators are saying: if an investment appears to be too good to be true, it probably is. Simultaneously, statistics show that the popularity of cryptocurrencies, as well as the potential fraud associated with them, has grown significantly in the last two years.
About FMA (Financial Markets Authority)
The New Zealand government's Financial Markets Authority (FMA) is in charge of making sure that securities, financial reporting, and company law are followed in the financial services and securities markets.

Securities exchanges, financial advisers and brokers, auditors, trustees, and issuers, including KiwiSaver and superannuation scheme issuers, are all regulated by the FMA. It collaborates with the Reserve Bank of New Zealand to oversee designated settlement systems in New Zealand (RBNZ). FMA is a member of the Council of Financial Regulators in New Zealand.
WikiFX Collaboration With FMA
WikiFX worked with FMA to solve all trading problems that came up because of its supervision. More than 39,000 brokers are listed on the platform, some of which are regulated and some of which are not. WikiFX collaborates with 30 other financial regulators, in addition to the FMA.

Keep an eye out for more regulatory news.
To stay up to date on the latest news, download the WikiFX app from the App Store or Google Play Store.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Voices of the Golden Insight Award Jury | Kazuaki Takabatake, CCO of Titan FX
WikiFX Golden Insight Award uniting industry forces to build a safe and healthy forex ecosystem, driving industry innovation and sustainable development, launches a new feature series — “Voices of the Golden Insight Awards Jury.” Through in-depth conversations with distinguished judges, this series explores the evolving landscape of the forex industry and the shared mission to promote innovation, ethics, and sustainability.

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr
