简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Solana Cashio Hack Loots $52.8M: Investigations Reveal Surprising Facts
Abstract:Crypto trading platform Bybit said that the hack drained $52.8 million worth of stablecoins including USDC, USDT and UST from Cashio and Saber.

Key Insights:
Solanas Cashio hack drained $52.8 million from the protocol.
To prevent, protocols should be properly and thoroughly audited.
Hacker left a message to return funds for accounts below 100K and donate the rest to charity.
Cashio (CASH), a native stablecoin of Solana, recently lost millions after hackers exploited an “infinite mint glitch.” The attackers drained a staggering $52.8 million from the protocol, following which the CASH stablecoin collapsed from $1 to $0.00005, which left the entire decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem appalled.
Initially, it was reported that Cashios protocol exploited cryptos equaling about $28 million. According to a security researcher Samczsun, the project lost around $50 million (based on quick skimming).

With these estimates aside, crypto trading platform Bybit came up with a fresh investigation on the hack, discovering precisely $52.8 million of stolen funds.
“The exploited amount also far exceeded what most other publications reported. To elucidate, most publications who reported on this exploit seem to think that $28 million was drained from this hack,” the Bybit readings noted.
As a quick recap, CASH, the dollar-pegged stablecoin, is minted by depositing stable pair liquidity provider tokens (LP tokens), in this case, USDT and USDC pair in a 50:50 ratio on Solanas decentralized exchange – Saber.
What Actually Happened? A to Z of the Hack
FXEmpire spoke to a team from Bybit comprising Derek Lim, head of crypto insights, Gabriel Foo, senior research analyst and Fathur Rahman, COO of SolanaFM, on the alarming exploit. Per their findings, the hacker first managed to mint “two billion CASH tokens” by using the perpetrators unknown tokens. But, how is this possible?
Furthermore, the hacker burnt part of the newly minted CASH tokens (2 billion) for the Saber USDT-USDC LP tokens. The hacker then swapped the LP pair tokens for $16.4 million USDC and $10.8 million USDT.
The Bybit investigations further found that the remaining CASH tokens were swapped out for $8.6 million UST and $17 million USDC through Saber. Finally, the hacker swapped $15.3 million in USDC and USDT after draining $52.8 million.
The hacker used the Jupiter liquidity aggregator on Solana to transfer the funds in 3 transactions to an Ethereum address through the Wormhole Bridge.
How To Prevent such Hacks? Possible Solutions
This isnt the first time a DeFi protocol has been looted for millions; however, this is the first of its kind “infinite mint” glitch. Every time after an attack, HODLers are warned to keep their tokens safe.
To prevent such acts, the team suggested the protocols to ensure that they have been properly and thoroughly audited. He said that DApps should adopt certain Tradfi structures and those of the big tech companies. Talking to FXEmpire,
“In other words, a more stringent auditing process should be initiated.”
This can be achieved by mandatory tests on the devnet for internal checks, during the development phase of any DApps. Furthermore, once the team is ready to stage the product after all internal checks, audit companies and tech alfa groups must step in to clear any bugs, edge cases, etc.
When the beta version is ready, more experts should be brought in to do a final check before the apps roll-out. Team consisting Foo and Rahman added,

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Scandinavian Capital Markets Exposed: Traders Cry Foul Play Over Trade Manipulation & Fund Scams
Does Scandinavian Capital Markets stipulate heavy margin requirements to keep you out of positions? Have you been deceived by their price manipulation tactic? Have you lost all your investments as the broker did not have risk management in place? Were you persuaded to bet on too risky and scam-ridden instruments by the broker officials? These are some burning issues traders face here. In this Scandinavian Capital Markets review guide, we have discussed these issues. Read on to explore them.

Uniglobe Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Explained: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker isn't just measured in pips and spreads; it's fundamentally defined by the reliability and transparency of its financial operations. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital seamlessly is the bedrock of trust between a trader and their brokerage. When this process is fraught with delays, ambiguity, or outright failure, it undermines the entire trading relationship. This in-depth analysis focuses on Uniglobe Markets, a broker that has been operational for 5-10 years and presents itself as a world-class trading partner. We will move beyond the marketing claims to scrutinize the realities of its funding mechanisms. By examining available data on Uniglobe Markets deposits and withdrawals, we aim to provide a clear, evidence-based picture for traders evaluating this broker for long-term engagement. Our investigation will be anchored primarily in verified records and user exposure reports to explain the Uniglobe Mar

In-Depth Review of Uniglobe Markets Trading Conditions and Account Types – An Analysis for Traders
For experienced traders, selecting a broker is a meticulous process that extends far beyond headline spreads and bonus offers. It involves a deep dive into the fundamental structure of a broker's offering: its regulatory standing, the integrity of its trading conditions, and the flexibility of its account types. Uniglobe Markets, a broker with an operational history spanning over five years, presents a complex case study. It offers seemingly attractive conditions, including high leverage and a diverse account structure, yet operates within a regulatory framework that demands intense scrutiny. This in-depth analysis will dissect the Uniglobe Markets trading conditions and account types, using data primarily sourced from the global broker inquiry platform, WikiFX. We will explore the Uniglobe Markets minimum deposit, leverage, and account types to provide a clear, data-driven perspective for traders evaluating this broker as a potential long-term partner.

In-Depth Review of MH Markets Trading Conditions and Leverage – An Analysis for Experienced Traders
For experienced traders, selecting a broker is a meticulous process that extends far beyond marketing claims and bonus offers. It involves a granular analysis of the core trading environment: the quality of execution, the flexibility of leverage, the integrity of the regulatory framework, and the suitability of the conditions for one's specific strategy. MH Markets, a broker with a 5-10 year operational history, presents a complex and multifaceted profile that warrants such a detailed examination. This in-depth review dissects the MH Markets trading conditions and leverage, using primary data from the global broker inquiry app, WikiFX, to provide a clear, data-driven perspective. We will analyze the broker's execution environment, account structures, and regulatory standing to determine which types of traders might find its offering compelling and what critical risks they must consider.
