简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Stock market picks: Goldman's 'unusual' strategy for debt issuers
Abstract:Companies racking up more debt are outperforming those reducing their debt. Goldman explains why, and the companies benefitting form this trend.
Over the past year, investors have shown a preference for companies with quality balance sheets.However, equity strategists at Goldman Sachs have found a more specific and “unusual” performance trend that runs counter to the marketwide leaning: firms spending cash to reduce their debt are lagging those issuing more debt. They introduced two new baskets of stocks to keep an eye on this trend.Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.Strategists at Goldman Sachs and elsewhere have recently recommended companies with strong balance sheets as sound investments to weather a global economic slowdown.Beyond the intuitive reason that their cash reserves are higher, these so-called quality stocks are in vogue because they've outperformed others splurging cash over the past year.Investors haven't always rewarded prudent uses of cash. For much of the 10-year bull market, when interest rates were close to zero, companies with the weakest balance sheets were able to tap the debt markets to raise capital. But that source of easy money was gradually closed off as interest rates rose, raising the allure of companies with more cash discipline. “Recent market performance indicates a clear investor preference for safe, high quality balance sheets rather than firms investing for growth, returning cash to shareholders, or paying down debt,” said David Kostin, the chief US equity strategist at Goldman, in a recent note to clients.And yet, Kostin's team found a more specific performance trend that runs counter to the marketwide preference for quality: companies racking up more debt are outperforming those reducing their debt. “Debt reducers” have underperformed “debt issuers” by 10 percentage points over the past year — 3% versus 13%, Kostin said. “This underperformance is unusual because most 'quality' strategies have outperformed during 2018 and into 2019,” Kostin said.Read more: The world's largest wealth manager just made a significant change to its $2 trillion portfolio — and it's a wake-up call to anyone invested in US stocksOne reason for this counter-trend has to do with Goldman's methodology, Kostin said. The strategists screened companies with the highest trailing 12-month net payments (or issuance) of debt as a share of their enterprise value. Unlike market capitalization, enterprise value takes account of how much debt a company has.This meant that Goldman's baskets of stocks skewed towards companies with lower valuations, Kostin said. “Our long/short value factor has lagged by 12% during the past year as investors have continued to reward growth stocks (+6%),” he added.It's also unusual because companies raised their cash spending by 25% to $2.8 trillion last year, according to Kostin, but investors have not rewarded most kinds of cash spending like debt repayments.As Kostin stressed, investors largely prefer companies with strong balance sheets. But this specific screening — of how companies are tackling their debt relative to their enterprise value — is one he says investors should keep an eye on. The basket of companies issuing more debt (which has outperformed the cohort of debt reducers) includes Twitter, Netflix, General Motors, Cigna, and Con Edison.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Scandinavian Capital Markets Exposed: Traders Cry Foul Play Over Trade Manipulation & Fund Scams
Does Scandinavian Capital Markets stipulate heavy margin requirements to keep you out of positions? Have you been deceived by their price manipulation tactic? Have you lost all your investments as the broker did not have risk management in place? Were you persuaded to bet on too risky and scam-ridden instruments by the broker officials? These are some burning issues traders face here. In this Scandinavian Capital Markets review guide, we have discussed these issues. Read on to explore them.

Uniglobe Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Explained: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker isn't just measured in pips and spreads; it's fundamentally defined by the reliability and transparency of its financial operations. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital seamlessly is the bedrock of trust between a trader and their brokerage. When this process is fraught with delays, ambiguity, or outright failure, it undermines the entire trading relationship. This in-depth analysis focuses on Uniglobe Markets, a broker that has been operational for 5-10 years and presents itself as a world-class trading partner. We will move beyond the marketing claims to scrutinize the realities of its funding mechanisms. By examining available data on Uniglobe Markets deposits and withdrawals, we aim to provide a clear, evidence-based picture for traders evaluating this broker for long-term engagement. Our investigation will be anchored primarily in verified records and user exposure reports to explain the Uniglobe Mar

In-Depth Review of Uniglobe Markets Trading Conditions and Account Types – An Analysis for Traders
For experienced traders, selecting a broker is a meticulous process that extends far beyond headline spreads and bonus offers. It involves a deep dive into the fundamental structure of a broker's offering: its regulatory standing, the integrity of its trading conditions, and the flexibility of its account types. Uniglobe Markets, a broker with an operational history spanning over five years, presents a complex case study. It offers seemingly attractive conditions, including high leverage and a diverse account structure, yet operates within a regulatory framework that demands intense scrutiny. This in-depth analysis will dissect the Uniglobe Markets trading conditions and account types, using data primarily sourced from the global broker inquiry platform, WikiFX. We will explore the Uniglobe Markets minimum deposit, leverage, and account types to provide a clear, data-driven perspective for traders evaluating this broker as a potential long-term partner.

In-Depth Review of MH Markets Trading Conditions and Leverage – An Analysis for Experienced Traders
For experienced traders, selecting a broker is a meticulous process that extends far beyond marketing claims and bonus offers. It involves a granular analysis of the core trading environment: the quality of execution, the flexibility of leverage, the integrity of the regulatory framework, and the suitability of the conditions for one's specific strategy. MH Markets, a broker with a 5-10 year operational history, presents a complex and multifaceted profile that warrants such a detailed examination. This in-depth review dissects the MH Markets trading conditions and leverage, using primary data from the global broker inquiry app, WikiFX, to provide a clear, data-driven perspective. We will analyze the broker's execution environment, account structures, and regulatory standing to determine which types of traders might find its offering compelling and what critical risks they must consider.
