WikiFX

Rispondi

As an experienced forex trader, evaluating the total trading costs—especially for major indices like the US100—is crucial for my decision-making. Unfortunately, with Mether World, I found a significant lack of transparency regarding all essential cost details. Their WikiFX profile does not provide any clear information about spreads, commissions, swap rates, or even the minimum deposit required for trading popular indices. This raises major concerns for me because, in my experience, reputable brokers are usually very upfront about trading costs; it's both a sign of professionalism and vital for budgeting and risk management. Complicating matters further, Mether World is entirely unregulated and flagged for “suspicious scope of business,” with a risk management index of 0.00 out of 10 and no valid regulatory credentials. This lack of oversight means there are no protective frameworks guaranteeing fair execution or transparent fee structures. For me, this essentially turns the potential “cost” of trading into an unpredictable risk, not just a line item. From what I could ascertain, trading on the platform requires the use of its own proprietary coin, “mcoin,” rather than fiat or commonly recognized currencies. Using an obscure or in-house currency adds another layer of risk and makes it even harder to objectively compare or assess fees against global standards. Given these concerns—absence of published cost information, unregulated operations, and the opaque use of an in-house token—I could not confidently calculate or estimate the total trading costs for indices like the US100 on Mether World. Personally, this lack of clarity is a strong signal for me to avoid committing significant capital, as cost transparency is a minimum standard I expect from any trading platform.