WikiFX

Rispondi

From my careful research, including a thorough review of RENADER FX, I was unable to find any clear or official statements regarding inactivity fees. Given the broker’s very recent entry into the industry (just 1-2 years in operation) and – more critically for me – the complete lack of meaningful regulatory oversight, I approach such absent fee disclosures with caution. The platform is explicitly flagged for having no valid regulatory information and a suspicious license, substantially increasing the risk that terms and conditions (including possible hidden or discretionary fees) might not be transparent or consistently enforced. In my experience, legitimate and established brokers almost always provide detailed, upfront information about potential charges—even for inactivity. With RENADER FX, because of the missing regulatory protection and the relatively opaque business profile, I do not feel confident assuming that just because fees aren’t listed, they do not exist. Instead, I recommend that any trader considering this broker insist on receiving all fee disclosures in writing from customer support and keep a healthy degree of skepticism, especially since high-risk brokers often change policies without warning. For my own capital, I would avoid funding an account where key information—such as inactivity fees—remains unclear or unverified.