In my experience as a trader, the apparent account types offered by VPS—namely SmartOne, SmartPRO, and SmartEasy—are primarily differentiated by their target user and platform experience. From what I observed, SmartOne is designed specifically for mobile users and those with a higher level of trading experience. This might appeal to traders who seek to manage their positions on the go or require tools favoring advanced analysis. Meanwhile, SmartPRO and SmartEasy seem to target users with varying degrees of experience, though the specifics of their distinctions aren’t documented in detail. What raises my concern is the fact that VPS does not support industry standards like MT4 or MT5, which are platforms I usually consider essential for flexibility and compatibility, especially if I want to automate trading or integrate third-party tools. This limitation can be significant depending on your trading style and tool requirements. I also noticed that VPS is not regulated by any financial authority, which means there is an absence of the usual oversight or client protection measures I expect from a broker. For me, this inherently increases the risk associated with any VPS account type, no matter the platform features or breadth of services. In my judgment, when selecting an account, my top priority remains regulatory protection and platform transparency, both noticeably lacking here. This is why I approach the distinctions among VPS account types with heightened caution and always ensure that risk management is front and center in my decision-making process.