WikiFX

Rispondi

Based on my careful examination of Motilal Oswal’s profile and features, there’s no official mention or transparent disclosure about inactivity fees. In my trading experience, this omission signals a need for heightened caution. Brokers with robust regulatory oversight generally make such fee structures explicit, often due to legal requirements and to foster client trust. With Motilal Oswal operating without active regulation and already flagged for suspicious licensing and high risk, I approach any cost-related ambiguity warily. A lack of clear information means I cannot definitively state whether inactivity fees apply or not; this uncertainty could expose clients to unexpected charges, especially if their account remains dormant. From my perspective, the absence of a demo account and regulatory clarity makes every aspect of their fee policy less predictable. For me, before committing funds, I would recommend directly contacting their support for written confirmation on inactivity fees and all account-related charges. Given their current regulatory standing, I find this essential to preventing potential surprises and safeguarding capital. Responsible due diligence is absolutely necessary in environments where transparency isn’t guaranteed.