WikiFX

Rispondi

As someone who’s spent years navigating the forex landscape, I always review broker fee structures with a critical eye—especially when it comes to hidden or inactivity fees. With Mahfaza, I made a point to comb through every detail available. Based on the information provided, I found no clear disclosure regarding inactivity fees or specific conditions under which such fees might be charged. This lack of transparency concerns me, as it leaves a significant aspect of account costs uncertain. From my experience, reputable brokers typically provide a clear, detailed fee schedule—including any charges for dormant accounts—so traders can make informed decisions and avoid potential surprises. Mahfaza does outline spreads for its account types and confirms that there are no commissions on trades, but relevant information about inactivity charges is notably absent. Given that Mahfaza also operates without any valid regulation, the uncertainty around fees is even more concerning. For me, the combination of unregulated status and incomplete fee information means I would exercise considerable caution. In my view, unless Mahfaza offers clear written confirmation on inactivity fees through their customer service, I would not assume this fee doesn’t exist. As with any broker, full transparency is non-negotiable for protecting my capital and peace of mind.