WikiFX

Rispondi

As someone who takes risk management and cost transparency seriously in my trading, I always investigate brokers’ fee structures thoroughly before opening an account. With Trade Capital Markets, I found that their WikiFX profile does not provide explicit details about inactivity fees or the conditions under which such fees might be charged. For me, this lack of clarity raises important caution flags—especially since an unclear fee structure is expressly noted as a drawback in the available information. From my experience, undefined or hidden inactivity charges can negatively impact long-term profitability, particularly for traders who do not trade continuously or who prefer to hold positions over extended periods. In this case, the absence of clear policy statements about inactivity fees means I cannot confidently determine the exact circumstances in which such charges could apply or the amount that might be deducted from idle accounts. Given the regulatory ambiguity noted with a suspicious clone FSCA license and several withdrawal-related complaints from users, I would strongly recommend contacting Trade Capital Markets directly via their official channels for a written confirmation of all potential account maintenance or inactivity-related costs before proceeding. For me, this is a necessary step to ensure there are no surprises that could compromise my capital or trading flexibility with this broker.