WikiFX

Rispondi

Speaking as an experienced trader who prioritizes transparency and regulatory assurance, I find the lack of reliable information about StoneX’s EUR/USD spreads concerning. According to my research, including a close review of StoneX’s available materials, the broker does not disclose any clear details about typical spreads for standard accounts. This absence is notable—most brokers aiming to attract serious forex traders make their pricing structure, including spreads for major pairs like EUR/USD, easily accessible and explicit. What gives me further pause is StoneX's regulatory status. The WikiFX data shows StoneX currently has no valid regulatory oversight, and its license claims appear flagged or even potentially cloned. For me, unregulated status combined with such a sparse approach to critical trading conditions like spreads introduces significant risk. In my trading, I have always viewed spread transparency as a fundamental sign of trustworthiness, not just for cost calculation but as a proxy for how a broker treats its clients overall. In sum, I cannot provide a typical EUR/USD spread because StoneX does not make this information public. This lack of clarity, when paired with limited regulatory assurances, makes me quite conservative regarding StoneX for any real-money trading decisions. I strongly advise verifying all trading conditions in writing and approaching unregulated brokers like this one with heightened caution.