WikiFX

Rispondi

Based on my review of MC900, I exercise a high degree of caution. What immediately stands out to me is the broker’s highly questionable regulatory status. With unverified claims of regulation in both Cyprus (CYSEC) and the UK (FCA), plus a “Suspicious Regulatory License” warning and a risk management index of zero, the potential for trust and oversight issues is significant. The total lack of regulatory credibility compels me to be very conservative with any aspect of account funding. My priority as a responsible trader is always the security and traceability of my funds. I could not find clear, reliable information about supported deposit methods, including whether Bitcoin or USDT are accepted. When a broker lacks verified regulation and transparency, I never recommend using irreversible methods like cryptocurrencies for deposits. These transactions cannot be undone if anything goes wrong, and, without credible oversight, there’s very little recourse available to clients. For me, using crypto to fund an account with such a broker simply presents too much risk, regardless of whether it might technically be possible. Ultimately, until MC900 can provide proof of strict, reputable regulation and clear, official details about its deposit procedures, including cryptocurrencies, I would not feel comfortable funding an account—especially not with irreversible crypto assets. My experience teaches me to avoid brokers with ambiguous or suspicious backgrounds, prioritizing the protection of my capital above convenience.