WikiFX

Rispondi

Drawing from my personal experience and a detailed review of INVAST, I have found that information about inactivity fees is not clearly outlined or prominently disclosed by INVAST. In my view, this lack of specific guidance regarding inactivity or dormancy charges requires extra caution—especially considering how such fees can unexpectedly erode account balances for traders who are not actively engaged. Having traded across various platforms, I understand that some brokers implement inactivity fees as a means to cover administrative costs associated with maintaining dormant accounts. However, in the case of INVAST, the provided details focus primarily on trading fees, deposit and withdrawal structures, and platform features without any direct mention of inactivity penalties. For me, this omission means that I can't make definitive conclusions about the existence or nature of such fees with this broker. As always, before committing any funds to a brokerage, I make it a rule to either directly verify such policies via their official communication channels or seek clarification from customer support. Since INVAST operates under Japanese FSA regulation and tends to be conservative and transparent in most areas, I would expect them to openly provide such information if applicable. Still, due diligence is essential for any trader, and I advise reaching out to them directly for a clear answer prior to opening or leaving an account idle.