WikiFX

Reply

As an experienced trader who evaluates brokers with a conservative and detail-oriented approach, I always make it a priority to understand a broker’s fee structure—especially regarding inactivity or maintenance fees, which can significantly impact long-term trading costs. In my review of China Galaxy, I found that while the broker provides information on account types and available trading platforms, there is unfortunately no explicit mention of inactivity fees or their specific terms in the available documentation. For me, the absence of clear information about inactivity charges is a point of caution, particularly given the “medium potential risk” and user complaints around withdrawal difficulties. Such issues highlight the importance of absolute transparency when it comes to any potential costs that might affect account holders over time. As the broker is regulated in Hong Kong and has been operating for over a decade, I would expect full disclosure on all account-related fees. Without confirmed details, I cannot assume there are no inactivity fees, nor recommend relying solely on what is not stated. Therefore, before opening any account with China Galaxy, I strongly advise directly contacting their customer support for written confirmation about inactivity fee policies. In my experience, having this documentation helps protect your interests and ensures there are no unexpected charges should you choose to pause trading activity for any reason. Given the current lack of specifics, caution is warranted.