As an experienced trader, I pay especially close attention to a broker’s regulatory status because it’s one of the key layers of protection for my funds. With CAPITAL, I note that they are regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong. This regulator has a solid reputation in the region, and its oversight generally means the broker must adhere to strict financial, operational, and client money protection standards. For me, this oversight is reassuring—it indicates CAPITAL is held accountable for how they manage client funds, handle segregation, and report activity. However, I’ve also learned through experience not to assume regulation is a guarantee against all risks. While SFC regulation increases accountability and transparency, and the presence of specific licensed entities (like their subsidiaries) demonstrates legal qualification for futures trading, I am still cautious. For instance, since details about account features and transparency on fees are lacking, I know that regulation alone isn’t enough—I need to stay vigilant, ask detailed questions, and confirm processes for deposits and withdrawals. In summary, SFC regulation signifies a safer environment for my funds compared to unregulated entities, as it sets certain standards and recourse options. But as with any financial decision, I rely on both regulatory credibility and my own careful research before proceeding.