WikiFX

Reply

From my experience as an independent forex trader, transparent and fair fee structures are absolutely essential for establishing trust—or even basic usability—with any broker. In evaluating Questh X, I immediately encountered significant red flags related to their disclosures on fees. According to the available information, Questh X offers spreads "from 0.6," which on paper appears reasonably competitive by industry standards. However, what stood out to me was the almost complete lack of published details about commissions, actual execution costs, and other crucial aspects like deposit or withdrawal fees. This absence creates a concerning gap in information for traders who need to accurately calculate potential costs and manage risk. Additionally, Questh X claims maximum leverage up to 1:500, which, while typical of unregulated or aggressively leveraged brokers, can pose substantial risks and typically comes with hidden or complex fee structures. The tiered minimum deposit sizes (ranging from $10,000 to $1 million) suggest an exclusive, high-capital approach but provide no further insight into whether higher-tier accounts benefit from tighter spreads or reduced commissions. This opacity makes it difficult, if not impossible, to perform a true cost comparison to other, more established and regulated brokers. Ultimately, the lack of comprehensive and verifiable data on all trading fees, combined with warnings about high risk and unregulated status, leads me to urge extreme caution. For me, any broker that can't clearly and reliably detail both their commission and spread structures does not meet the basic standards needed for responsible and informed trading.