简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Powell’s Final Press Conference: Will Remain on the Federal Reserve Board
Abstract: /[Figure 1: Jerome Powell Illustration]On Wednesday, April 2026 (ET), Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell delivered his final press conference, announcing that the federal funds target range would re
On Wednesday, April 2026 (ET), Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell delivered his final press conference, announcing that the federal funds target range would remain unchanged at 3.50%–3.75%. He stated that monetary policy is “in a very good place,” with rates now close to the neutral range of 3%–4%. Amid rising oil prices and tariff pressures, Powell emphasized that the Fed will remain patient before considering rate cuts.
This event marked not only the end of Powells chairmanship, but also highlighted his strategic positioning under political pressure and economic uncertainty. After stepping down on May 15, Powell will remain on the Board of Governors through 2028, pending the conclusion of related investigations.
From an analytical standpoint, Powell‘s decision reflects a direct response to mounting legal and political challenges to the Fed’s independence. By staying on as a governor, he reinforces institutional continuity while signaling concern over increasing political interference. Overall, his final appearance can be characterized as a “measured and conservative” exit, emphasizing data dependence and patience, while leaving incoming leadership under Kevin Warsh with a complex policy environment.
Key Takeaways
- Policy Near Neutral
- Powell indicated that rates are slightly above the upper bound of neutral, placing policy in a “mildly restrictive” stance. This allows flexibility to monitor developments. Energy shocks from Middle East tensions and tariff impacts are viewed as largely transitory, expected to ease over the next two quarters.
- Reason for Staying on the Board
- Powell cited unprecedented legal challenges in recent months that threaten the Feds ability to operate independently. He stressed he will not act as a “shadow chair,” but will remain until investigations conclude, ensuring institutional credibility.
- Inflation and Growth Outlook
- Core PCE has risen to 3.2%, driven mainly by energy and tariffs. However, the U.S. economy remains resilient, with growth above 2%, supported in part by data center investment. The labor market shows modest cooling, with weak job growth but stable unemployment at 4.3%.
- Political Risks
- Powell warned against efforts to weaken the Feds structure, including removing voting rights from regional presidents or turning the Fed into a political body. Such actions, he cautioned, would erode market trust and undermine inflation control.
Analyst Perspective
Powell‘s decision to remain on the Board may raise questions about political optics, but it ultimately prioritizes institutional stability. With Brent crude approaching $120 amid ongoing Middle East tensions, the Fed’s decision to hold rates steady appears pragmatic. Premature easing risks reigniting inflation, while excessive tightening could damage economic resilience.
His endorsement of Warsh and emphasis on a smooth transition suggest an effort to anchor expectations. However, internal divisions within the Fed, including dissenting views on policy direction, indicate that future debates may intensify.
Risks remain elevated. A prolonged disruption in the Strait of Hormuz could sustain high energy prices, pushing inflation beyond “transitory” assumptions and forcing tougher policy decisions. Powells remark that he is “not a fan of the dot plot” also hints that forward guidance tools may be reassessed under new leadership.
Conclusion
Powell exits with a policy stance near neutral and a firm defense of central bank independence, maintaining stability amid multiple supply shocks. His decision to remain on the Board serves both as a safeguard against political pressure and a signal of continuity.
As geopolitical tensions persist and energy volatility rises, the Feds patient approach will be tested against stagflation risks. The broader takeaway is clear: central bank independence remains critical, but political interference is emerging as a growing systemic risk for global markets.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
