Equiti Review 2026: Rating, License, Complaints, and Scam Risk Signals
Equiti review 2026: WikiFX score 5.06/10, CySEC and Seychelles licenses, CNMV warning, withdrawal complaints, clone alerts, and the Mediatrix lawsuit context.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Spread Co review 2026: FCA license, WikiFX score 6.88/10, user complaints about withdrawals and taxes, unconfirmed office visit, and Indonesia blocking record.

Spread Co is a licensed broker in the UK, but its profile is not without pressure points. A complete review needs to look at both its FCA authorization and the warning signals that appear in its complaint history, field-survey findings, and cross-border compliance record.
The issue is not whether Spread Co has a license. The issue is whether the brokers overall profile supports confidence without further qualification.
According to its broker page, Spread Co currently has a WikiFX score of 6.88/10.

The rating breakdown shown on the page includes:
The stronger parts of the score are regulation, license, and business. The weakest part is risk control, which stands at 0.00. The risk-alert panel on the same page also states that WikiFX has recorded 6 user complaints against this broker, that there is 1 negative field-survey review, and that current data indicates the broker does not have trading software listed on the page.

This leaves the broker with a mixed profile rather than a clean one.
The full broker page is here:
https://www.wikifx.com/en/dealer/0001250812.html
WikiFX shows that Spread Co holds a Market Making License from the FCA in the United Kingdom under the licensed entity SPREAD CO LIMITED, license number 446677.

That places the broker inside a recognized UK regulatory framework. For any review of Spread Co license, this is the core positive point in the profile.
At the same time, the license sits alongside a complaint record, a negative field-survey note, and a cross-border blocking record. The presence of a license therefore answers only part of the review.
The broker page also includes a field-survey report stating that Spread Cos office presence in the UK was not confirmed.

According to the visit report, the inspection team went to the registered regulatory address but did not find verified evidence that the broker maintained a physical presence at that location. The report does not say the broker is nonexistent. It says that the office presence at the surveyed address could not be confirmed.
That point becomes more relevant when read together with user complaints involving withdrawals and communication.
The complaint section is one of the clearest sources of pressure in the Spread Co profile.
The recurring pattern is straightforward: multiple users said they could not withdraw funds and were asked to pay taxes, fees, or additional amounts before the withdrawal could be processed.
The complaint examples shown on the page include the following:
No single complaint settles the issue by itself. But the repetition of the same withdrawal-related pattern gives the complaint section weight in any Spread Co review.
Spread Co also appears in Indonesia’s regulatory blocking record.
In 2022, Indonesias BAPPEBTI included Spread Co on its list of illegal commodity futures trading websites that were blocked in the country because the broker did not hold the local authorization required to operate there.
This shows that UK regulation did not extend automatically to local permission in Indonesia. For brokers operating across borders, that distinction matters.
Spread Co is not an unlicensed broker. It has a real FCA license and a relatively long operating history.
At the same time, the broker profile also includes:
For that reason, the broker does not read as clearly low-risk.
A complete Spread Co review needs to hold both sides together.
Spread Co has a genuine FCA license, and that remains the strongest part of its profile. But the broker also carries a set of warning signals that should not be treated as secondary. The Spread Co rating on WikiFX remains moderate rather than strong, and the complaint history, office-visit result, and Indonesia blocking record all add caution to the picture.
The practical reading is simple: the license matters, but it does not settle the entire review. The exact entity, the withdrawal process, the complaint history, and the local regulatory position still need to be checked carefully before any account is opened.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Equiti review 2026: WikiFX score 5.06/10, CySEC and Seychelles licenses, CNMV warning, withdrawal complaints, clone alerts, and the Mediatrix lawsuit context.

B2Prime review 2026: revenue reached €52.8 million in 2025, but traders still need to look at B2Prime regulation, B2Prime rating, licences, products, and field survey results before deciding.

Weltrade review 2026: FSCA regulation, revoked NBRB and FSC licences, account types, leverage, platforms, and the main risk points traders should know.

CFI Group review 2026: regulation, trading platforms, fees, leverage, account types, and key risk points traders should know before opening an account.