简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
The Politics of Rates: Waller's Dissent Signals Shift as Chair Race Heats Up
Abstract:Governor Christopher Waller's decision to vote against the Fed pause has heightened speculation regarding his bid for the Fed Chairmanship. The move aligns him with the administration's preference for lower rates amidst ongoing political friction.

The Federal Reserve's January meeting highlighted the intensifying politicization of US monetary policy. Governor Christopher Waller joined Trump-appointed Governor Stephen Miran in dissenting against the hold, favoring a 25 basis point cut instead.
Strategic Alignments
Market observers view Waller's dissent as a potential pivot designed to align with the White House's economic preferences. With President Trump openly critical of Chair Jerome Powell and seeking a successor who favors cheaper financing costs, Waller's vote significantly boosts his profile.
Prediction markets, such as Polymarket, registered an immediate uptick in the odds of Waller being nominated as the next Fed Chair. His alignment with Miran creates a clear bloc within the FOMC pushing for continued liquidity provision.
Powell Defends the Institution
Amidst these internal maneuvers, Chair Powell used his platform to vigorously defend the Fed's independence. He addressed his recent attendance at a Supreme Court hearing, calling it perhaps “the most important legal case in the Fed's 113-year history.”
- Nominee Odds: Polymarket data suggests higher probability for Waller to replace Powell.
- Voting Split: A clear internal bloc formed with Waller and Miran backing a 25 bps cut.
- Institutional Risk: Powell emphasizes Fed independence amidst Supreme Court scrutiny.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
