WikiFX Deep Dive Review: ExpertOption
Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Warnings about the rise of romance scams in the UK forex market, where fraudsters exploit personal relationships to deceive investors online.

In the realm of forex trading, opportunities are frequently intertwined with perils. Envision an investor encountering a purported seasoned trading expert on a social platform, who imparts “exclusive” forex strategies and sketches a vision of effortless profits. Yet, upon transferring funds to a designated account, the platform swiftly manipulates market conditions or outright seizes the assets, inflicting substantial financial harm. This is no fabricated tale but a stark reality confronting UK forex participants in 2025. According to authoritative reports, romance scams have subtly infiltrated the forex ecosystem, resulting in investor losses exceeding £106 million during the 2024/25 fiscal year, with reported cases rising by 9%. This figure serves as a stark admonition: emotional bonds have become the scammers' sharpest tool, while forex's high-leverage framework magnifies the economic fallout for victims.

Conventional romance scams often masquerade as “emergency appeals” or “travel expenses,” but today, perpetrators have shifted their focus to the fertile ground of the forex market. They pose as adept trading consultants, cultivating trust via social media or messaging applications, before steering victims toward “proprietary” forex brokers or signal services. Targets are typically swayed by narratives of outsized returns—such as “doubling down on EUR/USD in a single trade”—prompting them to open accounts and deposit funds. Once the money arrives, the platform either engineers price swings to trigger margin calls or vanishes entirely.
This £106 million loss figure stems from the annual analysis by the City of London Police's National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB), encompassing 9,449 reported incidents in the 2024/25 fiscal year. Among these, forex-related scams account for approximately 30%: financial media assessments indicate that over one-third of romance scam victims are funneled into “high-yield” forex or contracts for difference (CFD) trades, with an average per-incident loss of £11,000. In the West Midlands region alone, such losses neared £2.7 million, while nationwide, investors aged 61 and above bear the brunt, their average losses surging 38% year-over-year from £5,800 to £8,000.
Even more concerning is the refinement of scam tactics through artificial intelligence. Fraudsters employ generative tools to fabricate trading logs or video calls, conjuring illusions of “real-time gains.” On a global scale, these maneuvers have siphoned off hundreds of millions of dollars—recent international efforts have reclaimed $439 million, with romance forex variants playing a notable role. In the UK, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has launched probes into several financial institutions' safeguarding protocols, uncovering gaps in suspicious transfer oversight.
To illuminate this issue more clearly, the following key metrics are aggregated from credible sources. These are not mere abstractions but quantifiable reflections of investors' tangible ordeals:
| Metric | 2024/25 Data | Year-on-Year Change | Estimated Forex Share |
| Total Losses | £106 million | +9% (reports) | ~30% |
| Average Per-Incident Loss | £11,000 | 0.38 | Up to £15,000 |
| Victim Cases | 9,449 | 0.09 | Over 2,800 |
| Older Victims (61+) | 40% share | 0.15 | Primarily forex-led |
Sources: NFIB & FCA reports. This table unveils how romance forex scams are transitioning from the fringes to the forefront, particularly on platforms offering leverage up to 1:500, where modest deposits can precipitate cascading risks. In contrast to straightforward romance “aid” scams, this variant is more insidious, cloaked in the guise of “investment guidance.”
Forex trading ought to rest on rational analysis, yet the intrusion of romantic elements frequently warps discernment. Industry specialists underscore that preventive measures surpass remedial actions:
In 2025, this surge in romance forex scams cautions us that greater market dynamism demands correspondingly elevated caution against latent threats. Financial institutions are advancing optimizations in artificial intelligence monitoring systems, while international collaborations are yielding initial successes. Ultimately, investors must maintain unwavering alertness—emotional connections, though invaluable, demand that investment choices withstand rigorous scrutiny. Before entertaining the next “intimate” recommendation, it is prudent to first examine the compliance of the associated trading account.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.

If you are looking into ICM Capital (also known simply as ICM), you might be attracted by their established history since 2017 or their access to the MetaTrader platforms. However, glancing at the surface isn't enough when your capital is at risk. With a concerning WikiFX Score of 2.46 out of 10, this broker is currently flashing warning signals that every potential client needs to understand before hitting the "Deposit" button.

In the world of online trading, trust is the currency that matters most. However, recent data aggregation by WikiFX has signaled a "level red" alert regarding Tradeview Markets. Between July and November 2025, our support center was flooded with complaints alleging that the broker unilaterally wiped out account balances under the guise of "negative balance reversal," while simultaneously employing "account deletion" tactics in Asian markets. This report investigates the alarming patterns behind these complaints and analyzes why existing regulations failed to protect these traders.

For traders asking, "Is ZarVista legit?", the evidence points to a clear and strong conclusion: ZarVista operates as a high-risk broker. While it shows a modern interface and different account types, these features are overshadowed by major weaknesses in how it is regulated, a history of legal problems, and many user complaints. This article will break down these issues to give you a complete view of the risks involved. Our analysis shows that the chance of losing capital when dealing with ZarVista is very high. The combination of weak overseas licensing and documented problems creates a situation where trader funds are not properly protected.