简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
FCA Fines Traders £280K in Insider Dealing Crackdown
Abstract:Two UK traders fined £280K in FCA insider trading case, highlighting tougher market abuse regulation and surveillance compliance demands.

FCA Targets Independent Traders in Insider Dealing Case
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has secured fines totalling £280,000 and suspended prison sentences against two self-employed day traders for insider dealing, in a case underscoring the regulators uncompromising stance on market integrity enforcement.
Matthew and Nikolas West, acting outside any regulated firm, were found guilty of exploiting confidential broker information between 2016 and 2020. The FCA confirmed that the misconduct breached UK Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) and demonstrated that no participant in the capital markets is beyond regulatory scrutiny in trading.
Breach of Broker Confidentiality
Matthew West, a veteran trader with over two decades of experience, was approached under legitimate “wall crossing” arrangements to consider investments in upcoming capital raises—often involving Alternative Investment Market-listed companies. These arrangements required strict confidentiality.

Instead, Matthew passed the price-sensitive details to his brother Nikolas. The pair coordinated trades ahead of public announcements, generating over £44,000 in gains. However, under UK trading regulations, penalties were calculated on the total value of all trades executed with inside information, not just profits.
The court ordered:
- Matthew West: 15-month prison term (suspended for two years), 200 hours unpaid work.
- Nikolas West: Six-month prison term (suspended for 12 months).
Both must also contribute over £50,000 towards prosecution costs and pay the confiscation order within 14 days or face further custodial sentences.
Surveillance and Compliance Imperatives
The FCA stressed that this was not institutional misconduct but an opportunistic case of capital markets misconduct. The regulator warned that surveillance systems for compliance must adapt to detect suspicious trading activity monitoring across all communication channels, including encrypted messaging and voice notes.
Firms are expected to:
- Capture all business-related communications.
- Detect evasive language and unusual behavioural patterns.
- Regularly calibrate alert logic and escalation protocols.
- Embed a compliance culture led from the top.
Legal Framework and Regulatory Expectations
Under Financial Conduct Authority insider dealing rules and Market abuse regulation UK, firms must maintain insider lists, control access to sensitive data, and ensure timely public disclosures. FCA Handbook SYSC 10A mandates recording and monitoring of relevant communications, while Market Watch 79 highlights recurring failings in alert calibration and off-channel communication oversight.
The FCA‘s enforcement actions in this and other insider dealing cases reaffirm that market integrity enforcement is not just about having policies—it’s about ensuring they work in practice.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Firsttrade Review: Traders Raise Ponzi-Style Scam Concerns, Withdrawal Denials & More Issues
Have you lost all your capital while trading via Firsttrade? Does the US-based forex broker disallow you from withdrawing funds? Do you have to pay massive fees when transferring funds? Does your trade get affected because of frequent malfunction in the trading app? These have been haunting many traders at Firsttrade. Consequently, many of them have raised complaints online. In this Firsttrade review, we have shared such complaints. Keep reading to know about them.

Don’t Get Scammed: A Roundup of Common Online Fraud Tactics in Forex
Forex scams are evolving faster than ever; learn the most common tactics (cloned platforms, fake investment managers, fake recovery services) and how to spot them before you deposit.

Defcofx Review: Spread Manipulation & Poor Customer Support Outrage Traders
Does the poor customer support service leave you stunned when trading via Defcofx? Do you receive blunt, negative responses from the support team on several trading queries? Does the Saint Lucia-based forex broker pile on the losses for you by manipulating forex spread charges? In this Defcofx review, we have shared some complaints made against the broker. This will further answer your question: Is Defcofx real or fake?

Ponzi Scheme Operator Sentenced to 14 Years in Western Australia
Chris Marco, a Ponzi scheme operator, was sentenced to 14 years for a $34 million investment fraud in Western Australia. Read about the case and its impact.
