简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:India’s financial regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), has imposed a penalty totaling INR 3.2 million (approximately USD 37,000) on Tauga Private Limited—formerly OctaFX India Private Limited—for operating an unregulated Forex trading platform. This Settlement Order represents SEBI’s latest enforcement action against a retail trading provider, reflecting growing scrutiny of online brokerage services in India.

India‘s financial regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), has imposed a penalty totaling INR 3.2 million (approximately USD 37,000) on Tauga Private Limited—formerly OctaFX India Private Limited—for operating an unregulated Forex trading platform. This Settlement Order represents SEBI’s latest enforcement action against a retail trading provider, reflecting growing scrutiny of online brokerage services in India.
Background
Following an email report from BSE on March 14, 2022, SEBIs examination uncovered that:
Key Settlement Terms
After filing an initial Settlement Application, the authorized representative met SEBIs Internal Committee on January 23, 2025. Following feedback, a Revised Settlement Terms (RST) package was submitted, comprising:
SEBIs High Powered Advisory Committee (HPAC) reviewed and recommended approval of the RST on March 13, 2025. The Panel of Whole Time Members formally accepted these recommendations on April 22, 2025, informing Tauga on May 5, 2025. The settlement amount was duly credited, and the registration surrender and cancellation were finalized on June 27 and July 9, 2025, respectively.
The Situation of OctaFX
This action follows OctaFXs earlier regulatory clash in Singapore, where its website was blocked for breaching the Securities and Futures Act 2001. Together, these measures underscore a pattern of global financial authorities targeting online brokers offering derivatives without requisite licenses.
Implications for Traders and Brokers

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

The British banking giant HSBC Holdings Plc has announced a potential $1.1 billion charge connected to the long-running Bernard Madoff Ponzi scheme, following a legal ruling in Luxembourg. The claim stems from Herald Fund, a European investment fund that sued HSBC over alleged losses related to the Madoff fraud.

BofA Securities, Inc. (BofAS) has agreed to pay a $155,000 fine and accept a censure from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) after FINRA found multiple violations of market trading and supervisory rules.

Malaysia’s Securities Commission warns that complaints about unlicensed investment activities have doubled in five years—3,602 cases in 2024 and 2,039 in H1 2025—highlighting increasingly sophisticated scams targeting even professionals and seniors. Schemes often mimic legitimacy, then block withdrawals via “compliance” or “maintenance” excuses. The core defense is pre-investment verification and ongoing risk control.

Recently, reports have surfaced online exposing yet another withdrawal scandal involving FinPros, a forex broker that claims to be regulated by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC). According to the report from the victim, FinPros froze her legitimate profit of USD 197, citing a bizarre reason: “suspected collusion with other violators during trading.”