VT Markets Review: Regulation, Licences and WikiScore Analysis
This VT Markets review provides a comprehensive analysis of the broker’s regulatory framework, licensing coverage, and overall standing based on information available on WikiFX.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:OANDA Japan terminates dormant accounts with no balance after two years, requiring re-registration. Learn about the policy and OANDA’s recent expansions.

OANDA Japan, a subsidiary of the global brokerage OANDA Corporation, has permanently deleted accounts inactive for over two years with zero balance, the company announced on Monday. This action, aligned with its terms for trading over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives, aims to maintain operational efficiency and ensure compliance with regulatory standards. The policy, though long-standing, may catch some traders off guard if they leave accounts idle without formally closing them.
On May 20, the company sent emails to affected users, informing them that their unused accounts were closed and cannot be brought back. The online trading platform made it clear that this decision is final, and deleted accounts are gone for good.
Traders who want to start trading with OANDA Japan again after their account is deleted will need to sign up from scratch. This includes submitting new identity documents to meet regulatory standards. The company stressed that these steps are crucial to comply with local financial laws.

This practice of clearing out inactive accounts isnt unique to OANDA Japan. Many brokerage firms regularly remove unused accounts, especially those with no money or recent activity. This helps keep operations smooth, protects user information, and cuts down on extra costs.
Some traders who left their accounts without officially closing them might be surprised by this move, even though it‘s been part of OANDA Japan’s rules for a while. The company urges users to stay updated and manage their accounts actively to avoid unexpected issues.
These changes come after OANDA Global Corporation, OANDA Japan‘s parent company, was bought by FTMO Group in February this year. The acquisition has led to new services, like the launch of OANDA Labs Trader, which signals the company’s move into proprietary trading.
OANDA has also expanded its offerings by adding Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) to its European investment options. These steps show OANDAs focus on growing its services while keeping its strong commitment to following regulations and supporting customers.
In conclusion, OANDA Japan‘s removal of inactive accounts highlights the need to keep trading accounts active and compliant. For users whose accounts were deleted, the only option is to re-register fully. This move matches industry norms and helps ensure trading platforms remain secure and efficient in today’s fast-changing financial world.
You can check out more of Oanda's latest news here: https://www.wikifx.com/en/dealer/0001134561.html

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

This VT Markets review provides a comprehensive analysis of the broker’s regulatory framework, licensing coverage, and overall standing based on information available on WikiFX.

Failing to withdraw your funds earned on the FXDD platform because of technical glitches? Do your emails seeking clarification on stuck funds come unanswered from the Malta-based forex broker? Have you even encountered deposit credit failures and received almost a muted response from the customer support official? These issues have allegedly become headlines on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. This FXDD review article thus aims to uncover everything about the brokerage entity, including user complaints. Read on!

Principal presents a deeply concerning profile for forex traders, with an overwhelmingly negative track record that demands serious attention before considering any investment. With an overall rating of just 2.3 out of 10 based on 21 reviews, this broker exhibits a troubling 95.2% negative rate, with 20 out of 21 reviews expressing dissatisfaction. While Principal may carry some recognition for having a good reputation and being considered safe in certain contexts, these perceived strengths are dramatically overshadowed by critical operational failures that directly impact traders' financial security. The most pressing issues center around systematic withdrawal delays and rejections, which represent the primary complaint among users and raise immediate red flags about fund accessibility. Read on!

Considering Deriv for Forex trading? Discover critical insights into Deriv regulation, recent WikiFX score reductions, and alarming 2025 user exposure cases. Make an informed decision before you login Deriv.