简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
ASIC Shuts Down 95 Scam Companies in Major Crackdown on Fraud
Abstract:The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has received Federal Court approval to shut down 95 companies involved in suspected investment scams.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has received Federal Court approval to shut down 95 companies involved in suspected investment scams. This follows a major investigation revealing how these businesses were used to trick people into investing in fake trading schemes.
The court found that the companies had been set up with false information and had no proper management. It ruled they should be closed on “just and equitable” grounds. Most of the companies had no real assets and were not conducting any genuine business.
Many were connected to websites and apps that appeared to offer trading in foreign exchange, cryptocurrencies, and commodities. In reality, these platforms were part of complex scams designed to steal money from investors.
One common tactic was a type of scam known as “Sha Zhu Pan”, or “pig butchering”. This method is often linked to organised crime groups in Southeast Asia. It involves scammers building personal relationships with victims online before convincing them to invest in fake trading accounts.

According to the court, the scammers would first gain the victims trust, often through social media. Over time, they would introduce the idea of investing. The trading platforms were manipulated to show fake profits, which encouraged victims to invest even more money. But when they tried to withdraw their funds, the money was gone.

Read here to learn why scammers let you win during the initial phase: https://www.wikifx.com/en/newsdetail/202503148244401400.html
At the time of the court hearing, liquidators had already received around 1,500 claims from people who lost money. The total amount of claims was over AUD 35 million. It is unclear whether this figure includes both the original investments and the promised profits.
Only two of the companies had any significant assets, and none appeared to be active businesses. This suggested that the companies were created mainly to support the scams.
Justice Angus Stewart, who issued the courts ruling, described how victims were slowly manipulated until they were convinced to invest large amounts of money. He said the scam was like “fattening pigs for slaughter”.
ASIC‘s Deputy Chair, Sarah Court, said many of the companies were designed to look like real businesses, giving the scams a sense of credibility. She said ASIC’s action was necessary to protect the public from fake companies with no proper oversight.
However, Court warned that shutting down one scam is not the end of the problem. She compared the situation to a hydra - when one head is cut off, two more grow in its place.
Catherine Conneely and Thomas Birch from Cor Cordis have been appointed as joint liquidators. They will now oversee the process of closing down the companies and investigating any remaining assets.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Seaprimecapitals Withdrawal Problems: A Complete Guide to Risks and User Experiences
Worries about Seaprimecapitals withdrawal problems and possible Seaprimecapitals withdrawal delay are important for any trader. Being able to get your money quickly and reliably is the foundation of trust between a trader and their broker. When questions come up about this basic process, it's important to look into what's causing them. This guide will tackle these concerns head-on, giving you a clear, fact-based look at Seaprimecapitals' withdrawal processes, user experiences, and trading conditions. Most importantly, we'll connect these real-world issues to the single most important factor behind them: whether the broker is properly regulated. Understanding this connection is key to figuring out the real risk to your capital and making a smart decision.

iFX Brokers Review: Do Traders Face Withdrawal Issues, Deposit Credit Failures & Free Coupon Mess?
Have you had to pay several fees at iFX Brokers? Had your trading profit been transferred to a scamming website, causing you losses? Failed to receive withdrawals from your iFX Brokers trading account? Has your deposit failed to reflect in your trading account? Got deceived in the name of a free coupon? Did the broker officials not help you in resolving your queries? Your problems resonate with many of your fellow traders at iFX Brokers. In this iFX Brokers review article, we have explained these problems and attached traders’ screenshots. Read on!

NinjaTrader Exposed: Why Traders are Calling Out NinjaTrader’s Lifetime Plan & Chart Data
Did NinjaTrader onboard you in the name of the Lifetime Plan, but its ordinary customer service left you in a poor trading state? Do you witness price chart-related discrepancies on the NinjaTrader app? Did you have to go through numerous identity and address proof checks for account approval? These problems occupy much of the NinjaTrader review online. In this article, we have discussed these through complaint screenshots. Take a look!

Questrade Review Pros, Cons and Regulation
Is Questrade legit? Yes—CIRO regulated broker offering stocks, ETFs, forex, CFDs, bonds, and more with low fees and modern platforms.
