简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Hacker Who Breached SEC Account and Falsely Announced Bitcoin ETF Approval Faces Trial
Abstract:Eric Council Jr., a 25-year-old from Alabama, admitted to hacking the SEC’s X account to post a fake Bitcoin ETF approval, profiting $50,000. Sentencing is set for May 16, 2025.

A 25-year-old Alabama man, Eric Council Jr., has pleaded guilty to charges related to hacking the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC) X (formerly Twitter) account in January 2024. His actions led to the unauthorized publication of a false announcement claiming the SEC had approved the first-ever spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF), causing significant market volatility.
Fake Bitcoin ETF Post and Market Manipulation
Court documents reveal that Council gained unauthorized access to the SECs X account through a SIM swap attack. This technique allowed him and his associates to temporarily take control of the account and publish a fraudulent post, accompanied by an image of SEC Chair Gary Gensler, falsely announcing the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs.
The incident occurred on January 9, 2024, at a time when analysts widely expected the SEC to make an official ruling on Bitcoin ETFs. Following the false announcement, Bitcoins price surged by over $1,000 within minutes, only to decline rapidly once Gensler and the SEC confirmed that the post was not authentic. Less than 24 hours later, the SEC formally approved spot Bitcoin ETFs, but the temporary manipulation had already caused financial disruption in the market.
Prosecutors allege that Council personally profited approximately $50,000 from the price movement caused by the fake post. He reportedly used a forged identification document and deceived a mobile store employee into assisting him in compromising the SECs account.
Legal Proceedings and Potential Sentencing
Following an investigation, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) arrested Council in October 2024. Initially pleading not guilty, he later agreed to a plea deal, admitting to one count of conspiracy to commit aggravated identity theft and access device fraud.
On February 9, 2025, U.S. prosecutors proposed a forfeiture order, requiring Council to surrender the $50,000 he earned from the fraudulent announcement. If the order is signed by U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, he will also face a minimum prison sentence of two years, as stipulated under federal law for identity theft-related offenses.

Since his arrest, Council has been free on a personal recognizance bond and was permitted to travel during the holidays. However, his final sentencing is scheduled for May 16, 2025, when the court will determine the severity of his punishment.
This case highlights the growing risks of cyber-enabled financial manipulation and the importance of cybersecurity in financial regulatory institutions. As the cryptocurrency market continues to expand, regulators and market participants must remain vigilant against fraudulent activities that seek to exploit digital platforms for financial gain.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

KKR Exposed: Traders Allege Fund Scams, Withdrawal Denials & Regulatory Concerns
Do you witness a negative trading account balance on the KKR broker login? Does the broker prevent you from withdrawing your funds after making profits? Do you need to pay an extra margin for withdrawals? These trading issues have become common for traders at KKR. In this KKR broker review article, we have elaborated on the complaints. Take a look!

In-Depth Uniglobe Markets Regulation and License Overview: A Trader's Due Diligence Report
This in-depth overview will conduct a thorough Uniglobe Markets regulatory status and financial authority check. By dissecting data from regulatory bodies, corporate registries, and user-reported experiences, we will provide a clear, data-driven analysis of the protections—or lack thereof—afforded to clients. The central question we aim to answer is whether Uniglobe Markets meets the stringent safety standards required by serious, long-term traders.

Kraken Review: A Tale of Unsolved Withdrawal Issues & Poor Customer Support Service
Does Kraken disallow you from withdrawing your trading capital, including profits? Does it demand extra deposits in exchange for fund withdrawals? Is the customer support service inept in solving your forex trading queries involving deposits and withdrawals? In this Kraken review guide, we have discussed these complaints. Read on to explore the complaints against the US-based forex broker.

Scandinavian Capital Markets Exposed: Traders Cry Foul Play Over Trade Manipulation & Fund Scams
Does Scandinavian Capital Markets stipulate heavy margin requirements to keep you out of positions? Have you been deceived by their price manipulation tactic? Have you lost all your investments as the broker did not have risk management in place? Were you persuaded to bet on too risky and scam-ridden instruments by the broker officials? These are some burning issues traders face here. In this Scandinavian Capital Markets review guide, we have discussed these issues. Read on to explore them.
