WikiFX Valentine's Message | Trade Safely, Together Every Step of the Way
In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has initiated legal action against Aipu and Fidefx, alongside individual defendants Qian Bai, Lan Bai, and Chao Li, accusing them of fraudulently soliciting and misappropriating at least $3.6 million from 32 customers.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has initiated legal action against Aipu and Fidefx, alongside individual defendants Qian Bai, Lan Bai, and Chao Li, accusing them of fraudulently soliciting and misappropriating at least $3.6 million from 32 customers. The lawsuit alleges that the defendants orchestrated a fraudulent investment scheme, misleading investors under the guise of trading in commodities.
According to the CFTCs complaint, Qian Bai and Lan Bai, acting as controlling individuals of Aipu, alongside Fidefx and Li, worked as a coordinated group in defrauding investors. The defendants are said to have solicited funds from customers in the form of fiat currency and digital assets, offering agreements or contracts for trading commodities on a leveraged or margined basis. These transactions were reportedly marketed as involving off-exchange retail foreign currency contracts or commodity futures contracts.
The scheme involved customers being encouraged to fund supposed “trading accounts” with Aipu or Fidefx through their respective websites, which were nearly identical in design but operated under different names. The defendants' solicitors contacted customers through popular communication platforms such as WeChat, WhatsApp, and Line. These solicitors falsely claimed to have insider knowledge that could yield returns of 10% to 30% per trade in leveraged retail transactions, retail forex, or futures contracts. As part of the pitch, customers were told that they would receive tailored trading advice to ensure profitable trades.

Once customers deposited funds into their “trading accounts,” they were given access to online account statements purportedly showing deposits and successful trades made on their behalf. However, these account statements were entirely fabricated. Neither Aipu nor Fidefx held U.S.-based trading accounts or conducted any trades for customers. Instead, the defendants misappropriated all assets provided by customers, transferring the funds to offshore entities that were unrelated to any legitimate commodity trading activities.
The complaint further alleges that throughout the fraudulent operation, the defendants collaborated with solicitors to collect fiat and digital assets from customers, instructing them to transfer the funds into bank accounts and digital wallets under their control. These accounts were not managed by any CFTC-registered futures commission merchant or retail foreign currency dealer, as required by law. Instead of utilizing the funds for legitimate trades, the defendants diverted the money to offshore accounts controlled by individuals outside of the U.S.
The CFTCs legal action aims to hold the defendants accountable for their fraudulent conduct and recover the misappropriated funds. The case underscores the need for consumers to exercise caution when engaging in online trading platforms, particularly those that claim high returns with minimal risk. The ongoing investigation will focus on ensuring restitution for the affected customers.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support

Did you face losses due to a sudden change in the trading price on the datian platform? Were your transaction records deleted by the Hong Kong-based forex broker? Did the broker liquidate your trading account multiple times despite not reaching the stage where it mandated this move? Have you experienced heavy slippage on the trading platform? Concerned by these issues, traders have complained about the broker online. We will let you know of these with attached screenshots in this datian review article. Keep reading!

Did you face constant rejections of your fund withdrawal applications by TopstepFX? Have you been denied withdrawals in the name of hedging? Did you witness an account block without any clear explanation from the forex broker? There have been numerous user claims against TopstepFX regarding its withdrawals, payout delays and other issues. In the TopstepFX review article, we have investigated the top complaints against the US-based forex broker. Keep reading!

When choosing a broker, the first question is always about safety and legitimacy. Is my capital safe? For Mazi Finance, the answer is clear and worrying: Mazi Finance is an unregulated broker. While the company, MaziMatic Financial Services LTD, is registered in the offshore location of Saint Lucia, this business registration does not replace strong financial regulation from a top-level authority. Independent analysis from regulatory watchdogs shows a very low trust score, made worse by official warnings from government financial bodies and many user complaints about serious problems. This article provides a clear, fact-based analysis of the Mazi Finance regulation status. Our goal is to break down the facts and present the risks clearly, helping you make an informed decision and protect your capital.