简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
CFTC secures Court order against several objects in Ponzi scheme case
Abstract:The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has achieved a significant legal victory in a case against Sam Ikkurty, Jafia, LLC, Ikkurty Capital, LLC, and related entities. Judge Mary Rowland of the Illinois Northern District Court granted a summary judgment in favor of the CFTC, ruling on all counts of the complaint.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has achieved a significant legal victory in a case against Sam Ikkurty, Jafia, LLC, Ikkurty Capital, LLC, and related entities. Judge Mary Rowland of the Illinois Northern District Court granted a summary judgment in favor of the CFTC, ruling on all counts of the complaint.
The court order, announced today, mandates substantial financial repercussions for the defendants. Sam Ikkurty of Oregon, along with Jafia, LLC and Ikkurty Capital, LLC, operating under various names such as Rose City Income Fund I, Rose City Income Fund II, and Seneca Ventures, LLC, faces a combined restitution and disgorgement totaling more than $120.6 million. This includes over $83.7 million in restitution and $36.9 million in disgorgement, jointly and severally.
The judgment stems from allegations that the defendants orchestrated a Ponzi scheme, deceiving investors through false promises and misrepresentations. According to the CFTC, Ikkurty attracted participants through webinars and trade shows, enticing them with guarantees of a 15% annual income from investments in digital asset commodities like Bitcoin and Ethereum, as well as commodity interests.
Judge Rowland's order affirms that these representations were misleading, with Ikkurty failing to deliver any actual profits to investors. Instead, funds were allegedly misappropriated, including through a dubious carbon offset program where promised collateral was not obtained, resulting in significant financial losses for participants.

In addition to the financial penalties, the defendants were found to have violated the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations, including operating as unregistered commodity pool operators. The court emphasized that digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum fall under the CFTC's regulatory purview, extending to other virtual currencies such as OHM and Klima.
The CFTC cautioned that while orders for restitution aim to recover lost funds for victims, the complex nature of Ponzi schemes often means that full recovery may not be possible if perpetrators lack sufficient assets.
The outcome underscores the CFTC's commitment to protecting investors and maintaining integrity in commodity markets, signaling a stern stance against fraudulent schemes within the digital asset sector.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Hankotrade Exposed: Does it Harm Traders with Manipulated MT4 Chart and High Spreads & Slippage?
Have you witnessed a manipulated MT4 chart on Hankotrade login, showing inaccurate trading figures? Have you been victimized by high swap fees, inflated spreads, and massive slippage? Is the payment processing time too long at Hankotrade? Do you face downtime issues, especially when the New York trading session is on? These are some top complaints against the Belize-based forex broker. In this article, we have shared these complaints. Take a look!

Switch Markets Review: Do Traders Face Deposit Discrepancies and Account-related Issues?
Do you fail to deposit your funds into the Switch Markets forex trading account? Earned profits, withdrew them too, but did Switch Markets block your deposits? Wanted to close your trading account due to payment-related issues, but in turn got your emails blocked by the Australia-based forex broker? Faced a negative trading account balance because of illegitimate trade order execution? Many traders have shared these stories about Switch Markets on broker review platforms. In this Switch Markets review article, we have mentioned the same. Read on!

Is IEXS Safe or a Scam? A 2025 Review Based on 13 User Complaints and Regulatory Red Flags
You're asking a direct and important question: Is IEXS safe or a scam? As someone who might trade with them or already does, this is the most important research you can do. While IEXS says it is a global broker with over ten years of experience, a detailed look at its regulatory status and many user reviews shows serious warning signs that cannot be ignored. The evidence suggests a high-risk situation for traders' capital. This review will examine the available information, from official regulatory warnings to concerning first-hand user complaints, to give you a clear and fact-based view of the risks involved in trading with IEXS. Our goal is to give you the facts you need to make a smart decision.

Having Trouble Getting Your Funds Out of IEXS? A Simple Guide to Delays and Solutions
Are you having trouble withdrawing funds from your IEXS account or facing delays getting your funds? Not being able to access your own capital is one of the most stressful situations any trader can face. It breaks down your basic trust with a broker. This isn't just annoying - it's a serious problem that can mess up your financial plans and cause a lot of worry. This guide goes beyond basic advice. We'll look at real user experiences and official regulatory information to give you clear answers. Our goal is to help you understand why IEXS withdrawal problems happen and show you practical steps you can take. We understand your concerns and want to give you the information you need to handle this tough situation.
