简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
ASIC Halts Trademax CFD and FX Deals for Investors
Abstract:ASIC issues stop orders to prevent Trademax from selling CFDs and FX to unsuitable retail investors.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has intervened to safeguard retail investors by imposing two temporary stop orders on Trademax Australia Limited. These restrictions prohibit the financial services business from establishing new accounts or conducting contracts for difference (CFDs) or margin foreign exchange contracts (margin FX) with individual investors.
This decisive move is in response to concerns that Trademax has not met fundamental investor protection criteria. ASIC specifically noted difficulties with Trademax's retail product distribution, which seems to be inconsistent with the company's target market determinations (TMD). These TMDs are important because they determine who the products are appropriate for depending on the investor's financial status, investing goals, and risk tolerance.
The basis of ASIC's concerns focuses on Trademax's insufficient questionnaire for screening new customers. The regulator said that the questionnaire failed to adequately analyze potential customers' financial situation and risk tolerance, notably for high-risk, leveraged products like CFDs and margin FX. Furthermore, the questionnaire proved insufficient to assess consumers' awareness of CFDs involving crypto assets, despite the considerable risk associated with such products.

There were more difficulties with the questionnaire's design. It gave customers many chances to offer appropriate replies, possibly qualifying investors who did not satisfy the target market requirements. Furthermore, the questionnaire pushed users with caution to examine their replies if they did not immediately qualify, indicating a design that was more concerned with obtaining approvals than with determining eligibility.
The issuing of these stop orders, which are effective for 21 days unless reversed sooner, demonstrates ASIC's determination to enforce its design and distribution requirements. These laws require financial product issuers and distributors to adopt actions that are likely to correspond with the intended target market.
The intervention follows ASIC's Report 770, which was issued on September 6, 2023, and assesses retail OTC derivatives issuers' adherence to these responsibilities. The paper critiques the over-reliance on client surveys as the main technique for establishing client eligibility and recommends better use of existing data to improve distribution tactics.
This is not ASIC's first step at improving consumer safeguards in the CFD business. The regulator's continuing product intervention order for CFDs, which was implemented in response to results from 2017 to 2020 that demonstrated a high frequency of losses among retail customers, was recently extended until May 23, 2027. This ruling is part of a larger effort to protect retail investors against potentially hazardous financial products that may not meet their requirements or financial objectives.
To date, ASIC has issued 86 interim and one final stop orders under the design and distribution requirements, demonstrating its close monitoring of the financial markets. By pursuing such steps, ASIC strives to guarantee that financial markets run honestly and fairly, avoiding situations in which regular investors are exposed to unnecessary risk.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Firsttrade Review: Traders Raise Ponzi-Style Scam Concerns, Withdrawal Denials & More Issues
Have you lost all your capital while trading via Firsttrade? Does the US-based forex broker disallow you from withdrawing funds? Do you have to pay massive fees when transferring funds? Does your trade get affected because of frequent malfunction in the trading app? These have been haunting many traders at Firsttrade. Consequently, many of them have raised complaints online. In this Firsttrade review, we have shared such complaints. Keep reading to know about them.

Don’t Get Scammed: A Roundup of Common Online Fraud Tactics in Forex
Forex scams are evolving faster than ever; learn the most common tactics (cloned platforms, fake investment managers, fake recovery services) and how to spot them before you deposit.

Defcofx Review: Spread Manipulation & Poor Customer Support Outrage Traders
Does the poor customer support service leave you stunned when trading via Defcofx? Do you receive blunt, negative responses from the support team on several trading queries? Does the Saint Lucia-based forex broker pile on the losses for you by manipulating forex spread charges? In this Defcofx review, we have shared some complaints made against the broker. This will further answer your question: Is Defcofx real or fake?

Beware the “Ghost Brokers” This Halloween — Trade Safely with WikiFX
Stay safe this Halloween! Spot and avoid ghost brokers in the forex world with WikiFX – your trusted tool for verifying broker legitimacy.
