简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Barclays Capital reached an agreement to pay a $700,000 fine as part of a settlement with the FINRA.
Abstract:The settlement stems from alleged violations of FINRA rules regarding conflicts of interest involving research analysts. According to these rules, firms must have policies in place to prevent analysts from trading securities in a manner inconsistent with their published ratings, and must disclose any financial interests analysts may have in covered companies.

The settlement stems from alleged violations of FINRA rules regarding conflicts of interest involving research analysts. According to these rules, firms must have policies in place to prevent analysts from trading securities in a manner inconsistent with their published ratings, and must disclose any financial interests analysts may have in covered companies.
Between January 2016 and August 2019, Barclays purportedly failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system, including written procedures, to comply with these rules. Specifically, the firm neglected to adequately monitor its research analysts' managed brokerage accounts for compliance with trading restrictions or to ascertain if they held securities in covered companies. This failure resulted in the non-disclosure of analyst-held securities in 99 equity research reports, as well as the oversight of three instances where an analyst's external account manager traded against their published recommendations.
These actions led to violations of several FINRA rules, including 2241(b)(2)(J), 224l(c)(4)(A), 3110(a) and (b)(1), and 2010. Furthermore, Barclays' written supervisory procedures lacked a process to review securities transactions in analysts' external accounts for potential securities law violations, such as market manipulation and insider trading, thus contravening FINRA Rules 3110(d) and 2010.
Additionally, from April 2021 to March 2022, Barclays allegedly failed to gather data for certain clients of its affiliates to determine if disclosure of conflicts of interest was necessary in research reports. Consequently, the firm omitted disclosures in at least 803 reports covering 22 issuers, indicating affiliations and compensation received from issuers within the preceding 12 months, in violation of FINRA Rules 2241(c)(4)(D) and 2010.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

ASIC Launches Preliminary Investigation into Clime Australian Income Fund
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has launched a preliminary investigation into the Clime Australian Income Fund, examining whether the Fund’s Target Market Determination (TMD) and Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) comply with Australian financial regulations. The investigation will also assess whether any breaches of the law have occurred in relation to the Fund’s investment activities.

HSBC announced a $1.1 billion charge linked to the largest Ponzi scheme in financial history
The British banking giant HSBC Holdings Plc has announced a potential $1.1 billion charge connected to the long-running Bernard Madoff Ponzi scheme, following a legal ruling in Luxembourg. The claim stems from Herald Fund, a European investment fund that sued HSBC over alleged losses related to the Madoff fraud.

BofA Securities pays more than $150K fine to settle its charge
BofA Securities, Inc. (BofAS) has agreed to pay a $155,000 fine and accept a censure from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) after FINRA found multiple violations of market trading and supervisory rules.

SC Urges Malaysians To Stay Alert As Scam Complaints Double Since 2020
Malaysia’s Securities Commission warns that complaints about unlicensed investment activities have doubled in five years—3,602 cases in 2024 and 2,039 in H1 2025—highlighting increasingly sophisticated scams targeting even professionals and seniors. Schemes often mimic legitimacy, then block withdrawals via “compliance” or “maintenance” excuses. The core defense is pre-investment verification and ongoing risk control.
