简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
ATC Brokers Allegedly Involved in $78M Oasis Ponzi Scheme
Abstract:The legal battle surrounding Oasis, a fraudulent $78 million forex investment scheme, has shifted course as the court reconsiders a complaint against alleged accomplices, including ATC Brokers, amidst accusations of involvement in fraudulent transfers, shedding light on a complex Ponzi scheme that deceived investors with promises of high returns.

The legal proceedings concerning Oasis, a fraudulent scheme worth $78 million posing as a forex exchange investment fund, have taken a new direction as the court reversed its decision to dismiss a complaint against alleged accomplices, including ATC Brokers.
Burton Wiand, representing Oasis International Group as the receiver, filed a lawsuit against ATC Brokers Ltd., co-founder David Manoukian, and Spotex LLC, accusing them of involvement in fraudulent transfers. Initially, the district court dismissed Wiand's claims, citing lack of standing and statutory immunity under the Communications Decency Act. Wiand's objective was to recover assets for the investors who suffered losses due to the purported forex trading venture promising high returns.
Oasis International Group portrayed itself as an attractive investment opportunity, pledging substantial profits through currency futures trading. However, it was later revealed to be an elaborate Ponzi scheme, deceiving investors and causing financial harm. Despite promising high returns, Oasis operators concealed losses, misused funds, and distributed fictitious profits, as indicated in court documents.

The appeal filed before the US District Court for the Middle District of Florida challenged the previous dismissal, asserting that Wiand indeed had standing to pursue fraudulent-transfer claims. Although the court acknowledged Wiand's lack of standing for tort claims, it erred in dismissing those claims with prejudice and in addressing the issue of statutory immunity prematurely.
ATC Brokers, headquartered in England and Wales, facilitated trading activities for Oasis, while Spotex provided software to present false returns to investors. Wiand's legal pursuit targeted these entities, alleging their involvement in facilitating the fraudulent scheme's operations.
The court emphasized that as a registered forex broker, ATC Brokers was obligated to conduct due diligence before accepting potential traders. ATC Brokers' services allowed licensed foreign investment entities to trade on London markets on behalf of their underlying investor clients.
ATC Brokers' approval of Oasis' forex trading accounts and provision of liquidity reportedly enabled Oasis to engage in high-risk trading activities. Leveraging at 100:1, Oasis made substantial bets, ultimately resulting in significant losses, according to the court's findings.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Seacrest Markets Exposed: Are You Facing Payout Denials and Spread Issues with This Prop Firm?
Seacrest Markets has garnered wrath from traders owing to a variety of reasons, including payout denials for traders winning trading challenges, high slippage causing losses, the lack of response from the customer support official to address withdrawal issues, and more. Irritated by these trading inefficiencies, a lot of traders have given a negative review of Seacrest Markets prop firm. In this article, we have shared some of them. Take a look!

GKFX Review: Are Traders Facing Slippage and Account Freeze Issues?
Witnessing capital losses despite tall investment return assurances by GKFX officials? Do these officials sound too difficult for you to judge, whether they offer real or fake advice? Do you encounter slippage issues causing a profit reduction on the GKFX login? Is account freezing usual at GKFX? Does the United Kingdom-based forex broker prevent you from accessing withdrawals? You are not alone! In this GKFX review guide, we have shared the complaints. Take a look!

Is Seaprimecapitals Regulated? A Complete Look at Its Safety and How It Works
The straightforward answer to this important question is no. Seaprimecapitals works as a broker without proper regulation. This fact is the most important thing any trader needs to know, because it creates serious risks for your capital and how safely the company operates. While this broker offers some good features, like the popular MetaTrader 5 platform and a low starting deposit, these benefits cannot make up for the major risks that come from having no real financial supervision. This article will give you a detailed, fact-based look at Seaprimecapitals regulation, what the company claims to do, the services it provides, and the clear differences between official information and user reviews. Our purpose is to give you the information you need to make a smart decision about the risks and benefits of working with this company.

Major Complaints of MUFG Broker in 2025 You Shouldn’t Ignore
2025 is about to end, and if you still want to be a trader or investor and are looking for a broker to invest with. It is important to read real user complaints first. This will help you understand the kind of problems users are facing with MUFG broker. In this article, we will tell you about the major complaints users have reported about MUFG in 2025, so you know what to watch out for. Do not ignore this MUFG broker article and understand the problems.
