简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
SEC Takes Action Against Algorithmic Trading Fraud Involving Over $1.5 Million
Abstract:The SEC charged Matthew Melton with fraud, alleging he misled investors about his algorithmic trading scheme, collecting over $3.4 million. Melton claimed his algorithm could generate 12% monthly returns but was unprofitable, misusing over $1.5 million for personal expenses and Ponzi-like payments.

In a significant move to safeguard investor interests, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has recently brought charges against Matthew Melton for defrauding investors through misleading representations related to his algorithmic trading scheme. This decisive action by the SEC underlines its commitment to uphold the integrity of financial markets and protect investors from deceptive practices.
Background of the Case
The case centers around Melton's algorithmic trading approach, specifically his Price Physics trading algorithm. From April 1, 2018, to October 31, 2020, Melton allegedly collected over $3.4 million from at least 23 investors, primarily based in Puerto Rico and sharing a common interest in outdoor activities. Melton's claim that his algorithm could generate consistent monthly returns of 12% was central to attracting these investments. However, contrary to his assertions, the SEC's complaint reveals that Melton's trading activities were consistently unprofitable.
Further complicating the issue, Melton is accused of misappropriating over $1.5 million of the invested funds. Instead of employing the funds as intended for algorithmic trading, he allegedly used them for personal expenses, including travel, sailing, and mortgage payments. This misuse of funds also involved Ponzi-like payments to other investors, a severe breach of trust and financial ethics.
SEC's Legal Actions
The SEC's complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, charges Melton with violations of federal securities laws. The Commission seeks extensive relief measures, including permanent injunctive relief, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, civil penalties, and an officer-and-director bar against Melton. This comprehensive legal action underscores the SEC's dedication to enforcing securities laws and ensuring fair play in the investment arena.

In a parallel development, the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York has announced criminal charges against Melton, highlighting the severity of the alleged misconduct.
The Role of the SEC
The Securities and Exchange Commission, as a federal agency, plays a pivotal role in regulating and overseeing the securities industry. Its mission is to protect investors, maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and facilitate capital formation. The SEC's actions against fraudulent activities, like the case against Melton, are vital in maintaining investor confidence and the integrity of financial markets.
Conclusion
The SEC's action in the Melton case is a clear message to the investment community about the seriousness with which it approaches its mandate of investor protection. This case serves as a reminder of the risks involved in algorithmic trading and the importance of due diligence by investors. The SEC remains vigilant in its pursuit of those who seek to undermine the financial system through fraudulent activities.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

GAIN Capital Review: Exploring Complaints on Withdrawal Denials, Fake Return Promises & More
Is your forex trading experience with GAIN Capital full of financial scams? Does the broker disallow you from withdrawing your funds, including profits? Have you been scammed under the guise of higher return promises by an official? Does the GAIN Capital forex broker not have an effective customer support service for your trading queries? Concerned by this, many traders have shared negative GAIN Capital reviews online. In this article, we have discussed some of them. Read on!

GCash Rolls Out Virtual US Account to Cut Forex Fees for Filipinos
GCash launches its Virtual US Account in the Philippines, cutting forex fees and empowering freelancers with higher take-home pay.

"Just 9 More Lots": Inside the Endless Withdrawal Loop at Grand Capital
Multiple investors are reporting a disturbing pattern of blocked funds and shifting requirements at Grand Capital. While the broker claims validity, regulatory bodies across three jurisdictions have issued warnings or blacklisted the entity entirely. The data suggests significant risk for anyone currently holding funds on this platform.
