简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Oppenheimer & Co. fined $450,000 for violating Cboe rules
Abstract:Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., a prominent financial institution, recently entered into a settlement agreement with Cboe Exchange, Inc., incurring a $450,000 fine. This settlement arises from alleged breaches of Exchange Rules spanning from January 1, 2017, to approximately September 15, 2021. In this article, we will delve into the particulars of the case, the issues in question, and the measures taken by Oppenheimer to address the situation.

Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., a prominent financial institution, recently entered into a settlement agreement with Cboe Exchange, Inc., incurring a $450,000 fine. This settlement arises from alleged breaches of Exchange Rules spanning from January 1, 2017, to approximately September 15, 2021. In this article, we will delve into the particulars of the case, the issues in question, and the measures taken by Oppenheimer to address the situation.
During the specified period, Oppenheimer faced accusations related to its reporting practices concerning the Large Options Position Report system (LOPR). It was reported that in at least 809,000 instances, the firm either failed to report or inaccurately reported positions to LOPR when their system did not recognize certain customers' accounts acting in concert, commonly referred to as “AIC.” When an account held positions with fewer than 200 options contracts, Oppenheimer's LOPR reporting system failed to consolidate the account with others acting in concert, resulting in the failure to report approximately 21,000 positions to LOPR in about 370,000 instances.
Furthermore, when an account or AIC group held options positions exceeding 200 contracts, Oppenheimer's LOPR reporting system erroneously omitted the aggregation of the account with others in concert, leading to approximately 29,000 positions being reported to LOPR with inaccurate AIC information in roughly 439,000 instances.
Oppenheimer also faced criticism for not establishing a supervisory system with written supervisory procedures (WSPs) designed to reasonably prevent and detect violations of LOPR reporting rules for accounts acting in concert. While WSPs were in place during the Relevant Period, their focus primarily centered on identifying AIC relationships at the account's inception and did not account for changes in AIC relationships. Additionally, Oppenheimer lacked a system for follow-up and review to identify changes in AIC relationships or verify that the AIC information reported to LOPR matched the information stored in customer account records.
Oppenheimer's Response
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. has neither admitted nor denied the alleged violations but has consented to the terms of the settlement. The firm has initiated efforts to rectify the LOPR reporting issue by September 15, 2021. While the settlement entails a substantial financial penalty of $450,000, it also includes a censure.
Conclusion
The settlement between Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. and Cboe Exchange, Inc. underscores the significance of accurate and punctual reporting within the financial industry. While Oppenheimer has accepted the fine and censure without admitting wrongdoing, this case serves as a reminder to financial institutions regarding the necessity of maintaining robust reporting systems and supervisory procedures to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of promptly addressing any deficiencies in reporting practices to uphold the integrity of the financial markets.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Seaprimecapitals Withdrawal Problems: A Complete Guide to Risks and User Experiences
Worries about Seaprimecapitals withdrawal problems and possible Seaprimecapitals withdrawal delay are important for any trader. Being able to get your money quickly and reliably is the foundation of trust between a trader and their broker. When questions come up about this basic process, it's important to look into what's causing them. This guide will tackle these concerns head-on, giving you a clear, fact-based look at Seaprimecapitals' withdrawal processes, user experiences, and trading conditions. Most importantly, we'll connect these real-world issues to the single most important factor behind them: whether the broker is properly regulated. Understanding this connection is key to figuring out the real risk to your capital and making a smart decision.

iFX Brokers Review: Do Traders Face Withdrawal Issues, Deposit Credit Failures & Free Coupon Mess?
Have you had to pay several fees at iFX Brokers? Had your trading profit been transferred to a scamming website, causing you losses? Failed to receive withdrawals from your iFX Brokers trading account? Has your deposit failed to reflect in your trading account? Got deceived in the name of a free coupon? Did the broker officials not help you in resolving your queries? Your problems resonate with many of your fellow traders at iFX Brokers. In this iFX Brokers review article, we have explained these problems and attached traders’ screenshots. Read on!

NinjaTrader Exposed: Why Traders are Calling Out NinjaTrader’s Lifetime Plan & Chart Data
Did NinjaTrader onboard you in the name of the Lifetime Plan, but its ordinary customer service left you in a poor trading state? Do you witness price chart-related discrepancies on the NinjaTrader app? Did you have to go through numerous identity and address proof checks for account approval? These problems occupy much of the NinjaTrader review online. In this article, we have discussed these through complaint screenshots. Take a look!

World Forex Review: Does the Broker Deny Withdrawals and Scam Traders via Fake Bonuses?
Does World Forex prove to be a not-so-happy trading experience for you? Do you struggle to withdraw your funds from the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex broker? Do you witness hassles depositing funds? Failing to leverage the World Forex no deposit bonus, as it turned out to be false? These accusations are grabbing everyone’s attention when reading the World Forex review online. In this article, we have shared some of these. Read on!
