World Cup Fever Is Here! Choose your broker like you choose your team
Join WikiFX and investors worldwide in celebrating the excitement of the 2026 FIFA World Cup!
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:Nigeria and other economies in Sub-Saharan Africa have been cautioned by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) against using foreign exchange interventions to strengthen domestic currencies.

Nigeria and other economies in Sub-Saharan Africa have been cautioned by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) against using foreign exchange interventions to strengthen domestic currencies.
The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) occasionally intervenes in the foreign exchange market to support banks and provide market liquidity.
About US$36 billion is the gross external reserve, a slight decrease from US$36.13 billion in February and US$36.4 billion in January of this year. The official exchange rate for the naira is N461/$, whereas the parallel market rate is closer to N740/$.
The CBN uses its foreign reserves and cash inflows from various industries, including dollar remittances from international corporations, to fund its initiatives.
The IMF said that because a lot of what people buy, especially necessities like food, is imported, local costs rise when currencies deteriorate relative to the US dollar. For the majority of the countries in the region, more than two thirds of imports are priced in US dollars.
The Fund noted that some central banks in the area have attempted to support their currencies by disbursing foreign currency to importers from their reserves, according to a report titled “African Currencies Are Under Pressure Amid Higher-for-Longer US Interest Rates” that was released Monday night.
However, there is little room to continue interfering in the foreign exchange markets as reserve buffers are running low in many nations.
Additionally, countries have implemented administrative restrictions like restricting foreign currencies or prohibiting foreign currency transactions. These policies may lead to significant distortions and open doors for corruption, according to the Fund.
The IMF asserts that nations whose exchange rates are not tied (fixed) to a currency have no alternative but to allow the exchange rate to fluctuate and tighten monetary policy in order to combat inflation provided that the external shocks are anticipated to endure.
It also stated that nations having pegged exchange rates would have to modify their monetary policies to match those of the pegged nation.
Fiscal consolidation can help both country groups contain external imbalances and reduce the rise in debt brought on by currency depreciation. Growth can be boosted by structural reforms, according to the Fund.
According to the IMF, as import prices have increased, the majority of Sub-Saharan African currencies have lost ground to the US dollar, fueling inflationary pressures throughout the continent.
This, coupled with a slowdown in GDP, forces decision-makers to weigh controlling inflation against a still-fragile recovery.
Given that the region's average depreciation since January 2022 is roughly 8%. But the extent differs from nation to nation. More than 45% of the value of the Ghanaian cedi and Sierra Leonean leone was lost, it added.
It further said that external forces were mostly responsible for the regional depreciations.
Investors left the region in favor of safer and better-paying US treasury bonds as a result of decreased risk appetite on global markets and interest rate increases in the US. As a result of the decline in demand for the region's exports brought on by the downturn in major economies, many countries saw a decline in their foreign exchange profits. In addition, increased import expenses in 2022 were brought on by high oil and food prices, which were partly caused by Russia's conflict in Ukraine, it claimed.
Large budget deficits, it said, have exacerbated the effects of these outside shocks by raising the demand for foreign currency. In 2022, about 50% of the region's countries had deficits that exceeded 5% of their gross domestic product, which put pressure on their exchange rates.
On average, an increase in inflation of 0.22 percentage points occurs in the region within the first year after a one percentage point increase in the rate of depreciation against the US dollar. There is evidence that when local currencies gain strength against the US dollar, inflationary pressures do not immediately decrease. Public debt increases as a result of weaker currencies, it added.
“Over 60% of the governmental debt in Sub-Saharan Africa is foreign, and about 40% of that debt is in US dollars for the majority of the nations. By the end of 2022, all other things being equal, the region's public debt will have increased by an average of 10 percentage points of GDP since the epidemic began. The public debt increase was kept to roughly 6% of GDP during the same period thanks to growth and inflation (which lowers the real worth of current debts),” it said.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Join WikiFX and investors worldwide in celebrating the excitement of the 2026 FIFA World Cup!

Some broker comparisons end with a confident "go with this one." This is not one of them — and that honesty is exactly what makes it worth reading. Wundersys and tradgrip are two young, offshore-registered brokers that keep popping up in front of beginner traders, often through aggressive online marketing. Both promise the usual buffet: tight spreads, generous leverage, multiple account tiers. And both, according to WikiFX, sit near the very bottom of the safety scale. So instead of crowning a champion, this comparison is really about something more useful: learning to read the warning signs, understanding the small differences that still matter, and knowing why "the better of two risky options" is still a conversation about risk.

If you trade forex from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, or Nepal, you already know the quiet truth that eats into every trader's results: it is not just the market that decides whether you profit — it is the cost of getting in and out of each trade. Shave a couple of dollars off your commission on every lot, multiply it across hundreds of trades a year, and you are looking at the difference between a strategy that works and one that bleeds out slowly. South Asian traders are some of the most cost-conscious in the world, and rightly so. So we pulled the data on the brokers most often recommended for the region, cross-checked every name on WikiFX, and ranked them by the one number that matters most here: what they actually charge you to trade. Before the list, one quick lesson that will make this whole ranking click.

If you have spent even a week inside trading communities lately, you already know the pitch by heart. Pass a quick "challenge," get handed a funded account worth tens of thousands of dollars, and keep up to 80% of everything you make. No risking your own savings, no slow grind of building capital from scratch — just skill, a small fee, and a fast track to the big leagues. It is the exact dream every new trader is secretly chasing, and an entire industry has sprung up to sell it. XPO Fund is one of the louder voices selling that story right now. Its website is slick, its plans sound generous, and its marketing leans hard on words like "industry's lowest fee" and "fast payouts." But before you reach for your card, there is one number sitting quietly on this firm's profile — a number it would rather you scroll past — that every experienced trader would beg you to look at first. And no, it is not the profit split. Let's pull XPO Fund apart piece by piece: what it actually is, who is real