简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
ASIC Seeks Court Order Against "Tyson Scholz" An ASX Influencer
Abstract:The Australian Federal Court ruled that social media 'influencer' Tyson Robert Scholz violated s911A of the Corporations Act by operating a financial services firm without an Australian financial services license between March 2020 and November 2021.

Mr. Scholz was accused of carrying on a financial services business without a license by delivering training courses and seminars about trading in ASX-listed securities, during which he made recommendations about share purchases, according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). Using the name '@ASXWOLF TS,' I'm promoting those courses and seminars on Twitter and Instagram. Making share purchasing suggestions on private internet forums (which he ran) and on Instagram.
Mr. Scholz's offering to paying subscribers included:
subscription/membership fees of $500, $1,000, or $1,500
offers of various levels of share trading training referred to as ‘Stage 1’, and ‘Stage 3’ packages, which were marketed as introductory or advanced seminars
offers of individual one-off share trading suggestions, or tips for a fee
the Stage 2 package provides one year‘s access to a private chat site, named ’Black Wolf Pit, using the online communications platform Discord.
The case will be scheduled for a case management hearing on January 31, 2023, followed by a subsequent hearing to address any outstanding problems, including any orders prohibiting Mr. Scholz from doing financial services without a license.
ASIC is seeking orders prohibiting Mr. Scholz from:
promoting or carrying on the business of providing recommendations or statements of opinions about the purchase of shares in return for payments of money or other benefits
directly or indirectly carrying on any financial services business in Australia
receiving, soliciting, transferring, or disposing of customer funds received in connection to providing recommendations or opinions about the purchase of shares.
The financial product advice supplied by Mr. Scholz was an intrinsic component of this company,' her Honour Justice Downes noted in her conclusion. His advice was not one-time, but rather part of the ongoing and systematic commercial activities from which Mr. Scholz profited.
Through his Instagram lifestyle and 'life story' postings, Mr. Scholz had created a reputation as a successful share trader with the capacity to discover attractive firms in which to invest. It didn't matter that the pieces made no overt suggestion to buy the shares: it was enough that Mr. Scholz mentioned a firm or its stock in the tales, generally in a manner that suggested that he loved that company.'
ASIC filed proceedings in the Federal Court in December 2021 seeking orders prohibiting Mr. Scholz from advertising or carrying on any financial services activity in Australia. On December 16, 2021, the Federal Court issued cooperation orders prohibiting Mr. Scholz from marketing or carrying on a financial services firm. Those orders were issued until the Court's decision on ASIC's request for a permanent injunction, which was heard in a contentious hearing in October 2022.
Find out more of ASX news here: https://www.wikifx.com/en/dealer/4321685308.html

Stay tuned for more Forex News.
Use the download link below to download and install WikiFX App on your mobile phones to stay updated on the latest news, even on the go.
Download link: https://www.wikifx.com/en/download.html

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Firsttrade Review: Traders Raise Ponzi-Style Scam Concerns, Withdrawal Denials & More Issues
Have you lost all your capital while trading via Firsttrade? Does the US-based forex broker disallow you from withdrawing funds? Do you have to pay massive fees when transferring funds? Does your trade get affected because of frequent malfunction in the trading app? These have been haunting many traders at Firsttrade. Consequently, many of them have raised complaints online. In this Firsttrade review, we have shared such complaints. Keep reading to know about them.

Don’t Get Scammed: A Roundup of Common Online Fraud Tactics in Forex
Forex scams are evolving faster than ever; learn the most common tactics (cloned platforms, fake investment managers, fake recovery services) and how to spot them before you deposit.

Defcofx Review: Spread Manipulation & Poor Customer Support Outrage Traders
Does the poor customer support service leave you stunned when trading via Defcofx? Do you receive blunt, negative responses from the support team on several trading queries? Does the Saint Lucia-based forex broker pile on the losses for you by manipulating forex spread charges? In this Defcofx review, we have shared some complaints made against the broker. This will further answer your question: Is Defcofx real or fake?

Beware the “Ghost Brokers” This Halloween — Trade Safely with WikiFX
Stay safe this Halloween! Spot and avoid ghost brokers in the forex world with WikiFX – your trusted tool for verifying broker legitimacy.
