MET

MET exhibits a high-risk profile. According to WikiFX data, the entity holds an extremely low overall score of 1.51, which reflects significant concerns across multiple assessment categories. It operates without any recognized regulatory licenses, placing client funds outside standard investor protection schemes. Public exposure reports detail problematic promotional tactics and raise serious questions about fund withdrawal processes. For these reasons, MET cannot be considered a safe or reliable choice for trading.

No, MET is not regulated. The WikiFX assessment indicates the entity does not hold any valid licenses from recognized financial authorities such as the FCA, ASIC, or CySEC. Its registration in China does not constitute a forex or CFD trading license from a major regulatory body. Operating as an unregulated entity means it lacks credible oversight and does not adhere to standard industry rules for client fund segregation, reporting, and dispute resolution.

The specific minimum deposit requirement for MET is not publicly disclosed in its available operational data. Without clear, transparent fee and account structure information readily available from the broker, it is challenging for potential clients to evaluate the initial capital commitment required. This lack of upfront transparency is a notable operational shortcoming.

Based on WikiFX data, there is no indication that MET offers access to the industry-standard MetaTrader 4 (MT4) or MetaTrader 5 (MT5) platforms. The absence of these widely trusted and feature-rich platforms is a significant limitation, as it restricts traders from using a familiar ecosystem of tools, indicators, and automated trading strategies (Expert Advisors).